Isabel Hardman Isabel Hardman

Can Iain Duncan Smith force Labour to continue his welfare reforms?

Iain Duncan Smith is taking the fight to Labour today, accusing them of being the ‘party of welfare’ with their ‘heads in the sand’ as he marks the next ‘roll-out’ of Universal Credit. Families will be able to receive the benefit for the first time from now on, with the ‘roll-out’ starting in the north-west of England.

The Work and Pensions Secretary was typically tetchy when confronted with the suggestion on the Today programme that his flagship reform had been beset by problems, saying:

‘Would you rather us take a gamble? Throw everything at it at once? Have a problem like tax credits where nobody got their money and it was a real disaster?’

He accused Mishal Husain of wanting ‘to try and look at this in an utterly negative way’, and argued that it was better to implement the reform slowly and get it right, rather than make a mess of it. Certainly its glacial progress seems to have been accepted by all – one of the ministers who has dealt with him on the reforms says ‘I do think it’ll work, but whether I’ll be alive to see it finished is another matter’ – but there is still a question about the politics around this reform.

Duncan Smith may taunt the Labour party publicly but behind the scenes what he is trying to do is ensure that he has sufficiently turned the tanker around on welfare reform so that Labour cannot go back over what he has done if it does come into government in 2015. The current Labour policy is that they support Universal Credit but will pause the project to get it in shape. At this point the party could declare the reform a mess and only proceed with a greatly scaled-back version.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.


Unlock more articles



Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in