This oil price slump is turning into a ‘black swan’: one of those economic events that seem to come from nowhere with strange and unforeseen effects. As Brent Crude dips below $70 a barrel and Opec sits on its hands, major banks face losses on financings for US energy companies that must have looked like the safest borrowers in the field in an earlier phase of the shale gas boom. As the rouble plunges and the Russian economy implodes, anyone holding debt paper issued by a Siberian oil giant or a contract to build an oligarch’s superyacht may end up lighting the fire with it. The only thing that has barely flickered is the price of petrol at the pump, so consumers are feeling scant benefit. Markets already nervous about global debt problems and deflation risks become daily more jittery. The world has learned to live with oil in the $80–$100 range, and the industry has invested and restructured with that as its breakeven target. A prolonged trough ought to be a cost-saving boost to growth, But oddly this swan feels more like a harbinger of uncertainty, and of consequences we really don’t need.
Norwegian hotshot
In Kazakhstan in 2003 I met a BG Group crew running a huge gas-field venture in the frozen Steppes. I knew little of BG — a FTSE100 company which is the former exploration arm of British Gas, separated from the utility Centrica in 1997 — but gained the impression of a tough-nut business doing its bit for Britain in some of the energy world’s nastiest locations. Canny investors thought so too, and the shares rose fourfold during the 12-year tenure as chief executive of Sir Frank Chapman, an unsung hero who should rank alongside Sir John Rose of Rolls-Royce but was far less often saluted.
After the autocratic Chapman retired in poor health at the end of 2012, BG seemed to go pear-shaped.

Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in