Andrew Gilligan

Chucking millions down the Tube

Transport for London is to waste £97 million on a ‘symbolic’ project to give wheelchair users access to Green Park station, says Andrew Gilligan. Why hasn’t Boris reined it in?

issue 19 September 2009

Transport for London is to waste £97 million on a ‘symbolic’ project to give wheelchair users access to Green Park station, says Andrew Gilligan. Why hasn’t Boris reined it in?

At the end of every government’s life there come events, big and small, which show quite clearly that what was once a convincing credo — convincing enough to win an election, anyway — has completely lost its bearings.

George W. Bush’s brand of conservatism died in the floodwaters of New Orleans. For two vital elements of New Labour — fiscal extravagance and gesture politics — some of the last rites are being performed in the rather more prosaic surroundings of Green Park tube station.

Transport for London has, you see, noticed that the tube, being underground and reached by steps and escalators, is not terribly accessible to wheelchairs. It is therefore proposing to spend extraordinary sums of money — £97 million at Green Park alone — to dig new lift shafts and passageways through the earth in order to deliver what it calls ‘step-free access’ for the disabled to some of its Edwardian stations. 

Buried in the small print of the plans is the final, definitive lunacy which trumps all the other lunacies. It turns out that the £97 million to be spent at Green Park, and the roughly £300 million to be spent elsewhere on TfL’s tube access programme, will only deliver step-free access from the street to the station platform. Boarding almost any train will still involve… a step — insurmountable to wheelchairs.

It turns out, therefore, that Transport for London is to spend not far short of half a billion pounds on something which will not substantially benefit even a single wheelchair-bound tube traveller; something which amounts to little more than the largest subsidy for disabled trainspotters in the history of the world.

Illustration Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in