Anna Aslanyan

Close to the bone

In Lidia Yuknavitch’s dystopia, Earth’s richer inhabitants have moved to a space station. But passion still burns through the universal gloom

issue 24 February 2018

Does J.G. Ballard’s ‘disquieting equation’, ‘sex x technology = the future’, still hold? Not in Lidia Yuknavitch’s novel, which imagines a society better described by the formula ‘the future = technology sex’. There is no procreation in it, and any manifestation of sexuality is a crime. Its inhabitants have left Earth for a space station, a hi-tech prison only the rich can afford, moving away from ‘a lunar landscape of jagged rocks, treeless mountains, or scorched dirt’, the scene of endless wars fought by child soldiers, where ‘technology is seized by those who kill best’. Both the ruined old world and the AI-ruled new one are frightening, and not so much because of their fantastic aspects as because they look so probable from today’s perspective.

The only vestiges of humanity retained by the space-dwelling elite are skin grafts: texts they burn on to their biosynthesised, nano-enhanced bodies as a way of telling stories in their ‘paperless existence’. This gives them a chance to put up a collective performance, a ‘literary and flesh uprising’ against the dictatorial world order. It all starts with the main narrator writing on her own skin the story of Joan of Dirt, an ‘eco-terrorist’ burnt at the stake — at least according to her ‘official deathstory’.

Growing up, Joan develops an uncanny intimacy with the natural world, already doomed for extinction. Soon a technological boom triggers global violence, and the planet, gripped by inequality and anthropocentricity, run by men who can only move ‘warward’ or ‘fuckward’, is headed for the end. Although Joan has what it takes to launch a crusade to save the Earth, her superhuman powers prove too destructive to restore the balance of things. And yet the story of the Maid of Orléans transferred to the age of AI is a timely reminder that resistance, however futile or dangerous, is always preferable to a passive acceptance of what’s imposed from above in the name of progress.

GIF Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in