David Ekserdjian

Coping with the Van Gogh syndrome

In the context of the visual arts, the notion of misunderstood genius is a comparatively recent one, and seems to be a by-product of Romanticism. In spite of such exceptions as Vermeer, whose current reputation stands so much higher than it did in his own day, in the main the Old Master canon remains startlingly unchanging. This state of affairs begins to change in the 19th century, and one unhappy consequence of what might be termed the Van Gogh syndrome is that we are now inclined to view artists who were outrageously successful in their own day with downright suspicion.

Sir Thomas Lawrence is surely as good a case in point as one could hope to find of this topsy-turvy prejudice. Having garnered every conceivable glittering prize throughout his life, as he progressed from infant phenomenon — the earliest drawings illustrated in Sir Michael Levey’s eloquent and impassioned new monograph were done when he was ten, and torn between a future with the brush or on the stage — to recording angel of the great and the good and President of the Royal Academy, he was ripe for a post- humous fall. What is more perplexing is that he has proved so hard to resuscitate, given the stupendous quality of his best work. In part, this may be a problem of access, in the British context at least, given how many of his most winning productions — the Calmady children, Elizabeth Farren, Sarah Barrett Moulton (‘Pinkie’), Lady Peel, Mrs Wolff — have ended up on the other side of the Atlantic. Arguably his fatal error, however, which remains unforgiven, is to have committed what is now regarded almost as the sin against the Holy Ghost, to have devoted his life to painting portraits.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in