Except that the cry has been more of a whimper. Western governments have largely ignored Beijing’s clampdown, which began in February as democratic activism spread from Cairo to Chinese websites. No trade sanctions or UN Resolutions are being issued here, just stern communiqués.
Some human rights activists have called on Bob Dylan’s celebrity to condemn the Chinese government outright. Dylan has left them as disappointed as his fans at the Manchester Free Trade Hall in 1966, prompting a spokesman from Human Rights Watch to spit upon Dylan’s ‘collusion’ with censorship.
Given that it’s nearly 50 years since Dylan purposefully stopped being the ‘voice of conscience’, his reticence does not come as a shock. And, as David Aaronovitch observes in today’s Times (£), why should Dylan do what we are too timid and politic to do? Besides, what could he achieve? Dylan’s words might be welcome to some Western ears, but he’s just one man selling records. He does not command divisions, even in the metaphorical sense. Human rights violations in China are for governments to challenge. Perhaps Dylan's silence expresses that.