One definition of addiction is repetition of a behaviour despite adverse consequences. Twitter users will know all about it, especially those on the end of abusive or illegal threats. All communication systems are, of course, liable to such misuse, but presumably technology will fix this problem. Meanwhile, Epictetus (AD 35–135), a freed slave, would advise the abused to (wo)man up.
Aristotle defined a decision as ‘a deliberate desire to do something within the agent’s immediate range of alternatives’. Building on this definition, Epictetus argues that our range of alternatives is restricted to our rational faculty, what goes on in our heads: ‘our opinions, impulses, desires, aversions’ and the actions that result from them. These, and only these, are ‘up to us’. Epictetus makes Zeus put it like this: ‘If you will take care of this faculty and consider it your only possession, you will never be hindered, never meet with impediments.’ In other words, if we ‘enable our mind to adapt itself to whatever comes to pass’, we shall lead a happy and trouble-free life.
Epictetus proceeds to give a number of examples. ‘If you see someone weeping at the departure of a child or loss of property… be at once ready to say: “It is not what has happened that afflicts this person, but his judgement concerning it.” Do not hesitate to sympathise with him, or even groan with him; but be careful not to groan inwardly too.’
More to the point, ‘Remember that what is insulting is not the person who abuses or hits you, but your judgment that these things are insulting. So when someone irritates you, realise that it is your own opinion that has irritated you.’ In sum: ‘Keep guard against yourself as your own worst enemy.

Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in