Disappointing to see that the government has retreated from its plans to exempt the disclosure of MPs expenses from being ocvered by the Freedom of Information Act. Yes, yes, everyone is supposed to hail this as a victory for transparency and, perhaps, as Iain Dale says, for online activism and lobbying too.
I fear we protest too much on this issue. Not because MPs expenses should be kept secret (of course they shouldn’t) but because a vote on the matter, with Labour MPs subjected to a three-line whip no less, would have a) been a monumental, and thus pleasing, embarrassment for the government and b) could easily have been repealed by a future Tory government.
In other words, parliament dodged a pratfall today. Better by far for the opposition to have had Labour hiding this stuff from the public. That would have confirmed the public’s suspicion that the government is both over-fond of secrecy and happy to accomodate the greed of porky MPs.
Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in