Sebastian Payne

Five things you need to know about the Scottish independence papers

Her Majesty’s Treasury and the Scottish government have been at war today. Both have released papers with conflicting predictions about whether the Scots would be better off outside of the UK. The SNP says individuals would be £1,000 better off out of the UK, while the Treasury argues they’d be £1,400 better off in the UK. Much of this analysis is based on negotiations that haven’t happened and economic forecasts that could easily change, but both papers offer much food for thought. Here are the five key competing claims you need to know from the fiscal policy papers:

1. A £1,400 UK dividend?

The Treasury’s Fiscal policy and sustainability paper (pdf) argues there is a £1,400 ‘UK dividend’ (from 2016-17 onwards) that benefits Scots — thanks to the pooled resources and shared risks of being in the United Kingdom. An independent Scotland would result in higher taxes and lower public spending, according to Danny Alexander. Alex Salmond on the other hand, has told the BBC ‘we calculate that as each individual in Scotland being £1,000 better off — that’s a £5 billion bonus, or a family £2,000 better off a year’ thanks to independence.

2. Too much debt?

According to the Treasury’s analysis, Scotland’s portion of the UK debt would be 74 per cent of its GDP in 2015-16; something they suggest could easily reach ‘unsustainable levels without policy action’. Alternatively, the SNP have said in their paper (pdf) Scotland’s predicted debt to GDP ratio is forecast to be lower than the UK’s under any potential outcome of negotiations, whilst pointing out Scotland is the 14th richest country in the world.

3. £2.7 billion to restructure Scotland?

The Treasury claims that there are £2.7

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.


Unlock more articles



Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in