
David Gauke, who along with Priti Patel accompanied George Osborne at the press conference, said his ‘challenge for Ed Miliband and Ed Balls is this: stop taking the British people for fools. If your policy is to borrow more then say you would borrow more’.
All very well and good (if you don’t mind ‘unhelpful’ calculations). But of course what happened straight after the formal speeches had finished was that journalists started asking Osborne and his colleagues for more clarity on something they are being rather shy in talking about, which is welfare cuts. Osborne was asked repeatedly why he wouldn’t spell out the detail of those cuts, and he repeatedly refused to give any more detail, saying simply that the Tories had managed to cut welfare while protecting the vulnerable in this Parliament and that they would do so in the next parliament. He was then asked by Michael Crick to rule out rolling child benefit into universal credit, which the IFS says would save £4.8 billion a year. The Chancellor replied that ‘you can judge us on our approach in this Parliament and if we wanted to put Child Benefit in with Universal Credit we would have done it’. Crick exclaimed ‘rule it out!’. Osborne replied: ‘Well, I’ve just given a very clear answer that if we had wanted to do it, we would have done it’. Not necessarily a clear answer, and still no more clarity on those welfare cuts overall.
Outside the briefing, Labour officials were handing out their own ‘analysis’ of the Tories’ ‘extreme’ spending plans, called ‘the Tories are the ones with questions to answer’.
The conclusion? Both parties have questions to answer. But they won’t answer them until one of them is in government. There is something slightly impressive, though, about a press conference that starts with a lecture about a party refusing to reveal its spending plans that then involves the lecturer refusing to reveal his plans for spending cuts.
Comments