As I’ve argued here on several previous occasions, Hillary Clinton’s pretence that she was a serious foreign policy player during her husband’s administration is simply laughable. Now her White House schedules have been released, prompting the New York Times to publish a piece that demonstrates that she was an important player in precisely zero foreign policy areas.
And the courageous, unintentionally hilarious, headline the NYT gives this? Clinton’s Schedules Offer Chance to Test Assertions. Well, yeah, that’s one way to put it.
Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in