Peter Robins

In and out of copyright

New Year’s Eve, among its other distinctions, is the date when copyright terms tend to expire: with the beginning of each new year, at least in this country, the public domain gets a little larger. In 2012, this has had a couple of effects in the world of digital bookchat.

One was a flurry of insulting tweets directed at Stephen Joyce, who has policed quotation of his grandfather James’s work with more vigour than many scholars would like. Since the elder Joyce died in 1941, and copyright expires in most places 70 years after the death of the author, the younger Joyce has now lost his grip on Dubliners, Ulysses and Finnegans Wake, although graduate students tempted to hit the retweet button should remember that the situation is much more complicated with works not published during the creator’s lifetime.

The other effect has been the circulation of an elegiac list published by the Center for the Study of the Public Domain. Each New Year’s Day, the Center tells the world what would have come into the public domain were it not for extensions to the copyright term, and the list this year is exciting: the books on it include Lolita, The Magician’s Nephew and the final volume of The Lord of the Rings, and there are films including Night of the Hunter, Rebel Without a Cause and The Seven Year Itch. For British readers, however, it’s a bit misleading; it tells you what would have become public domain under America’s old 56-year copyright term. We never had that. For us, it’s better considered a list of which works would have become reliably, if illegally, available on American websites.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in