Tom Goodenough Tom Goodenough

Jacob Rees-Mogg adds to Theresa May’s woes

Poor old Theresa May. Donald Trump’s Brexit comments have overshadowed the president’s long-awaited visit, but even after Trump departs for the golf course, her troubles won’t go away. Jacob Rees-Mogg offered an unwelcome reminder of that on the Today programme this morning, saying that he thought Trump had a point. Rees-Mogg said that all the president had done is spell out what was actually in the Brexit white paper. Take a look, he said, at this passage in the Brexit white paper:

For once, it seems, Trump has actually done his reading. In his comments to the Sun, Trump made it clear that Theresa May’s Brexit plan would mean the US “would be dealing with the European Union” instead of with the UK during trade talks. Given that the White Paper spells out exactly this – that if the UK wanted to make changes to regulation to open up a possible trade deal with another country, the government would need to ‘discuss this with the EU’ – it is hard to see how Trump is wrong.

So what does this mean for Theresa May’s future? Rees-Mogg suggested that the PM is of use only if she goes back to the Lancaster House Brexit script, gently hinting that it was time for a reboot of the Maybot:

‘Do you remember during the election campaign, she kept on saying ‘strong and stable’ and now she is saying ‘vote to take back control of our money, our laws and our borders’. We’re getting another one of these parroted phrases, and we need the parroted phrase to change. We need to get back to what she said at Lancaster House, which was a very good blueprint for leaving.’

Unlock unlimited access, free for a month

then subscribe from as little as £1 a week after that
SUBSCRIBE

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in