Theo Hobson Theo Hobson

Labour needs to rediscover its religious vision

One of our main political parties is at an immense disadvantage. Labour is tied to a form of idealism. Socialism is a strong form of idealism. It can only gain and hold power by diluting this idealism, mixing it with realism. This is psychologically difficult, existentially unstable. When it finds a way of gaining power, it is not calmly at ease with itself, but divided. And this intensifies after a period of power: purists seek revenge on those behind the ‘successful’ compromise. Blair’s Iraq war adventure is incidental to why he is so hated by the left. He is really hated for winning all those elections.

How has such a party survived thus far? How can the moderates bear to rub shoulders with the purists who so hate them? How, in the past, did idealism and realism manage to coexist? Only just is the short answer. But one aspect of it was religion. Christian socialism has served as a sort of glue of the idealistic and the realistic. It enables a rhetoric of unashamed moral crusading – and yet it also ensures that such rhetoric does not translate into fixed dogmatism. It makes room for self-criticism, flexibility.

The leader they should have chosen after Brown was Frank Field. He could have offered a more sober version of New Labour, morally earnest, unimpressed by money and power. Maybe he is still up for it. Who is a younger version?

Unlock unlimited access, free for a month

then subscribe from as little as £1 a week after that
SUBSCRIBE

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in