James Forsyth James Forsyth

Labour, partying at Britain’s expense

One of the things that will become apparent in the coming years is just how irresponsible this last Budget was. It put party ahead of country in a way that few Budgets ever had.

Many civil servants, who know the true numbers, are despairing about what it means for Britain’s future. Peter Oborne writes today that:

“One permanent secretary complained about the Budget, saying the Chancellor’s financial figures do not add up. He said: ‘We either need spending cuts, or a larger departmental budget. We are in a situation where the official figures are just not deliverable.’ Another civil servant is even gloomier. ‘We are moving towards a crisis which can only be resolved by an emergency statement to the House of Commons in the autumn,’ he warned. Other Treasury officials are pressing for the setting up of an emergency committee to investigate the need for drastic cuts in public spending. But No 10 will not permit such a move. This, in turn, has led to a growing dread inside the Treasury that the Debt Management Office (which sells gilts for the Treasury) will be unable to fund the budget deficit on international markets.”

Unlock unlimited access, free for a month

then subscribe from as little as £1 a week after that
SUBSCRIBE

Not only did the Budget put off the necessary tough moves on spending until after polling day, it was also built on over-optimistic growth forecasts. If these prove to be as wrong as independent forecasters expect them to be, the next government will have to take even more dramatic action to keep the debt to GDP levels manageable.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in