William Feaver

Lashings of homely detail

Norman Rockwell’s the name. You’ll know it of course. Rockwell the byword. It wasn’t simply the perpetual air of impending Thanks- giving that gave his Saturday Evening Post covers such appeal. Rockwell covers were cover stories really; that was their distinction. Others, John Falter for example or Steve Dohano, delivered similar eyefuls of graphic cheer to the mass readership but never came near him in popularity. They could ape the manner but not the air. Legend has it that, in his heyday, every time the Post ran a Rockwell, they upped the print order by a quarter of a million. Whether this is true hardly matters: print the legend.

Every cover picture off the Rockwell easel was bound to give the reader at least five minutes of viewing pleasure, hours possibly in the pre-telly age. Between 1916 and 1963 he produced more than 300 of them. That suggests not just evenings and days and years but entire decades, in aggregate, devoted by a high proportion of the One Nation Under God to his lashings of homely detail.

None more attentive than Richard Halpern, who teaches English at Johns Hopkins and approaches Rockwell’s art and mind with the caution of a scholar fully charged with powers of textual analysis. He confesses to being more art lover than art worldly. ‘Art makes most people nervous, outsider and insider alike,’ he ventures. Rockwell’s Dickensian storytelling aspect stirs him and the possibility of uncovering hidden depths has encouraged him to proceed.

Halpern is a sight too nosey by Rockwell reckoning, what with his talk of ‘disavowal’, ‘denial’ or ‘repression’ in the work. And when he gets on to ‘the secret sexuality of the banal’ that’s enough to set the rocking chairs ducking on the front porches.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in