Neil Clark

Let’s hear it for David Blunkett

Neil Clark says that the Home Secretary is wrong about many things, but not about life-imprisonment for murderers

issue 17 May 2003

Like most New Labour ministers, David Blunkett gets considerably more things wrong than he does right. Up to now, his tenure at the Home Office has been characterised by a series of ill-thought-out reforms, half-baked policy proposals and regular verbal gaffes. In three years we have had the draconian Anti-Terrorism Crime and Security Act – which suspends the 800-year-old habeas corpus in the case of foreign nationals suspected of terrorism – attacks on trial by jury, as well as criticism of Asian arranged marriages, and lectures on what language immigrants should speak in their own homes.

When he strays from his Home Office brief, Blunkett’s public pronouncements have been even more toe-curdling. His recent prediction that the Labour vote in northern local elections would be helped by a ‘Baghdad bounce’ – thereby implying that northerners would be more likely to support the bombardment of Iraq than namby-pamby southerners – received the contemptuous electoral response it deserved.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in