Sharron Davies

Men don’t belong in women’s sport

[Getty Images] 
issue 17 June 2023

Olympic leaders say there’s no such thing as male advantage in sport. Here’s a simple question for them: if that were true, why not just scrap sex-based categories of men and women altogether?

We all know why. Men run faster, jump higher and are stronger than women. In my sport of swimming, men are on average 11 per cent quicker than women. In boxing, their punches are 160 per cent more powerful. Such advantages mean that, on gender transition, mediocre male athletes are rocketing up the rankings, winning prizes and taking women’s places for one simple reason: whatever their feelings and life choices, they are biologically male.

So, faster, higher, stronger – but not better. Different. Human biology dictates it. In sport, sex matters. It’s binary and it governs safety and fair play. Inclusion makes a mockery of sport but it harms just one group: female athletes.

At the heart of a furious debate in which female rights, science and the nature of sport have been shoved aside, trans activists have had the ear of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), whose members insist that there is no evidence to suggest males identifying as trans women have an unfair advantage. That’s simply untrue. The IOC is also ignoring the 18 peer-reviewed studies which contain plenty of evidence to show that the vast majority of male advantages cannot be reversed through transition, or even mitigated to anything remotely close to fair play.

Inclusion makes a mockery of sport but it harms just one group: female athletes

These irreversible male advantages include height, muscle by weight, larger heart and lung capacity, higher metabolic rates, stronger ligaments and less risk of injury. Longer arms give a greater reach and can generate more speed on a cricket ball. Bigger hand spans can more easily palm a basketball. Longer legs and narrower pelvises lead to better running gaits.

GIF Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in