Dot Wordsworth

Mind your language | 25 July 2009

Dot Wordsworth on double negatives

issue 25 July 2009

The eccentric Sir George Sitwell, the father of Edith, Osbert and Sacheverell, had a valet called Henry Moat, who would also have been called eccentric had he not been a plain-speaking Yorkshireman. One evening after lugging a heavy trunk up the stairs of an Italian hotel he opened the door with his elbow and threw the heavy object on to the bed in the darkened room. It was unfortunate that the novelist Hall Caine was attempting to restore his frayed nerves in that very bed.

     Hall Caine, the first man in England to sell a million copies of a novel, is also the first recorded man to use a construction that is still controverted. ‘Suddenly the mischief of her sex came dancing into her blood, and she could not help but plague the lad,’ he wrote in The Manxman (1894), in a scene where Kate teases Pete, who has thrown gravel up at her window before dawn. I heard someone on the wireless last week use the same construction, ‘He could not help but turn,’ and I was irritated in an unfocused way. Should it not be, ‘He could not help turning’ or ‘He could not but turn’?

    The Oxford English Dictionary reminded its good readers that the Collect for the 15th Sunday after Trinity includes the words: ‘The frailty of man without thee cannot but fall.’ Since the days of Hall Caine, we’d be tempted to make it ‘cannot help but fall’. The OED also obligingly mentioned the parallel Latin construction non possum non. It is just this element of double negativity that sets users’ heads whirling and tempts them into nonsense. The liberal-minded Oxford Dictionary of American Usage opines that cannot help but ‘should no longer be stigmatised on either side of the Atlantic’, but it goes on to mock someone who said: ‘I cannot help from refraining myself to comment on Ms Gabor’s flagrant disrespect of the law.’

GIF Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in