The most damning bit of the lurid Mark Menzies case is that the Conservatives had been aware of the allegations for three months before they story broke this week – but only stripped him of the whip yesterday. It’s not a particular surprise, though: for years it has been clear that the whips office holds conflicting responsibilities of persuading MPs to vote as well as disciplinary or pastoral work. Something needs to change.
Some people are manifestly too vulnerable to cope with life even before they are selected
Parliament does have a very small HR system, though many MPs don’t know about it, much as many MPs don’t know about the help that the parliamentary wellbeing service can give them, including treatment for mental illness. Neither of these services are adequate, though. We have reached a stage where there needs to be an acknowledgement that the job of an MP is sufficiently pressured and demanding that not everyone is up to that life, and so there needs to be proper screening of candidates at an early stage, much as there is for other lines of work, like aviation.
Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in