Darren Grimes

My mum bought her council house. Can Laura Pidcock explain why that’s wrong?

The moment that has defined my approach to politics came when my mother told me the proudest moment of her life: buying her council house. 

Growing up in Consett, a former steel town in the north east, that house seemed to be like any of the other identikit terraced properties in the area. But to my mother, it was an asset she now owned and was able to pass on to me and my siblings. Later in life, I realised that Right to Buy had opened up new avenues for my mother, beyond having a roof over her head: it gave her choice, security, and a sense of achievement and self esteem. Especially as a single parent with three kids. 

That’s why it angers me when darlings of the Left like Laura Pidcock, the Labour newcomer and MP for North West Durham, pop up on Question Time to rail against politics which appeal to the aspirational working classes. During her appearance, Pidcock railed against Right to Buy, saying it was about time we looked at housing “through a human rights perspective rather than just seeing it… as a commodity or an asset, or something that we can float on the stock market, or whatever it is and bank lots of house(s) in London”. 

Pidcock claims to be a champion for constituents like my mother, while seeking to limit opportunities for the aspirational working class. But it gets worse. Pidcock once claimed that she was unable to buy a house on her MP salary of £76,000, and has in the past suggested that she would like to live in a council house but there aren’t enough.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.


Unlock more articles



Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in