Fraser Nelson Fraser Nelson

Now Labour would cut by 10 percent too

Andy Burnham has just let the cat out of the bag on Channel Four News: Labour would cut by 10 percent too. Our new Health Secretary has just been given a robust interview by Jon Snow and was asked if he would say there would not be cuts elsewhere if health is protected.  His reply:

“This is the big difference, Jon, because Andrew Lansley will not commit to the budget we have set for the NHS in 2010-11. I am committing to you that this budget remains and I am also committing to you, in the way that the Prime Minister has, that we will continue to maintain growth in health spending in the following period.”

Except the Prime Minister has given no such commitment. But Mr Burnham has. And explicitly. Emphatically. Unmistakably. The stated Labour and Tory position on post-election cuts is now identical. The Institute for Fiscal Studies analysis is clear: Budget 09 proposes 7 percent public service spending cuts from Apr11-Apr14, and if you exclude health from the cuts everything else falls by 10 percent. There is no other interpretation of what Burnham has just said, within the parameters of Budget 09. And if we are to believe the Health Secretary – and I will call the Department for Health to make sure what he just said is accurate – Labour has just matched Andrew Lansley’s pledge that health spending will increase in real terms. The Labour axe and the Tory axe would fall in the same way and any criticism Brown makes of this policy is criticism of his own Budget.

Faisal Islam’s Ch4 report, incidentally, was superb and quoted Gemma Tetlow, the IFS researcher who uncovered this in the first place. I do hope they put in on later: I’ll link if they do.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in