Theo Hobson

Perhaps, after all, sexual morality does still matter in politics

Perhaps, after all, sexual morality does still matter in politics
Text settings

This is not something that we are keen to discuss, for we are pretty sure that we have become far less puritanical, and that this is a good thing. But try this experiment. Imagine a slightly different version of Boris: funny, human, brilliant, a bit chaotic-seeming, and so on – but without any hint of sexual scandal.

There would still have been question marks over such a Boris becoming PM – especially after his opportunistic Brexit decision. But they would have faded as the prospect of a charismatic, nation-enthusing leader emerged. Some would have called this Boris fundamentally untrustworthy, citing episodes of bullying and aggressive ambition, but such qualms would have been marginal.

It is, I suggest, unthinkable that Michael Gove would have dared to present such a Boris as fundamentally unreliable.

But a reputation for sexual dishonesty changes things. It makes many people stop and think about his charm. For on a deep visceral level we are wary of charm that has the power to disrupt the most important human bonds. All politicians can be accused of dishonesty, and all leaders have a streak of ruthless ambition, but we want to feel that there are limits to this, that our leader is honest where it really matters, and being boringly married-presumed-faithful is a good shorthand for this.

There are other factors: men, for example, are naturally a bit resentful and jealous of a womaniser, and so are ready to see him put in his place. Good on you Govey, says the safe little uxurious voice in the nation’s head today.