Economists should always leave themselves a margin for error. When challenged that free-market policies on both sides of the Atlantic in the 1980s led straight from boom to bust, Milton Friedman argued that problems arose not when politicians applied his prescriptions too dogmatically, but because they only ever did so half-heartedly. John Maynard Keynes, the high priest of big government, changed his mind ‘when the facts change’ and was so magisterially flexible that he was able to express ‘deeply moved agreement’ with the moral stance of The Road to Serfdom, Friedrich Hayek’s sermon against the tyranny of the over-powerful state. The Harvard professors Kenneth Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart, by contrast, made the fatal mistake of offering a theory reducible by politicians to a soundbite that was also an unambiguous equation: countries whose debt-to-GDP ratio rises above 90 per cent suffer significantly slower growth.
Britain’s latest debt figures, announced on Tuesday, were not quite as dire as markets expected and Ed Balls hoped, bringing relief to the embattled and downgraded Chancellor Osborne with a slim reduction in the budget deficit for the year just ended. ‘Net debt’ to GDP stands at 75 per cent — but ‘gross debt’ (counting a wider set of liabilities) hit the 90 per cent mark last Christmas — and we’ve had another winter without growth. QED for Rogoff-Reinhart, you might think, but rivals at the University of Massachusetts have demonstrated that the duo made elementary ‘coding errors’ in their workings (omitting conflicting data from several countries) that render their findings unsound.
Politicians who quoted them are as embarrassed as the Harvard panjandrums themselves, the Guardian asks ‘How much unemployment did Reinhart and Rogoff’s arithmetic mistake cause?’ and the anti-austerity bandwagon gathers momentum with timely shoves from IMF economist Olivier Blanchard, European Commission president José Manuel Barroso, and leading bond fund manager Bill Gross of Pimco — whose message to ‘the UK and almost all of Europe’ is that ‘you’ve got to spend money’ to produce real growth.
Mr Gross’s contribution is certainly an example of how to avoid the Rogoff-Reinhart trap by keeping pronouncements quotable but safely in the sphere of broad generalisation.

Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in