Katy Balls Katy Balls

Sajid Javid offers a parting shot in resignation statement

Ahead of Sajid Javid’s resignation statement in the Commons, allies of the former chancellor were keen to press that it would be a friendly affair. The idea being that Javid wanted to use the traditional personal statement to be constructive rather than score points. In the end, there was plenty of praise for the Prime Minister as well as some laughter. But there was also much in the way of criticism for an unelected inhabitant of 10 Downing Street.

Javid praised Boris Johnson. He said the Prime Minister had been given a huge mandate to transform this country and was off to a ‘great start’. The former chancellor also lavished praise on his successor and one time deputy Rishi Sunak, saying he was certain Sunak would rise to the challenge before him. But for all Javid’s praise, he had next to nothing positive to say about Johnson’s aides. Javid said he had been given an impossible choice – to oust his aides in favour of No. 10 staff – which he could not accept as it would threaten the ability of the Treasury to work in the national interest:

‘Advisers advise, minister decide, and ministers decide on their advisors. I couldn’t see why the Treasury, with the vital role that it plays, should be the exception to that.A chancellor has to be able to give candid advice to a prime minister so he is speaking truth to power.’

While Javid didn’t go so far as to name Dominic Cummings, it was clear that it was him he was referring to. Javid and his team see Cummings as instrumental in forcing through changes to centralise power to Downing Street. He also went so far as to give a pretty big hint when he quipped that he didn’t want to dwell any more on ‘the Cummings and goings, if you will’.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.


Unlock more articles



Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in