Isabel Hardman Isabel Hardman

Shami Chakrabarti and Peter Whittle play the by-election blame game

Shami Chakrabarti and Peter Whittle would probably furiously deny playing by the same political rules. But this morning on the Andrew Marr Show, the Labour peer and Ukip politician were both using suspiciously similar scripts to try to excuse poor performances by their party leaders in Thursday’s by-elections.

First up, Peter Whittle on how Paul Nuttall managed to squander a golden opportunity in Stoke Central. Nuttall was on a trip, of the kind that apparently often happens after a by-election, so he couldn’t explain for himself. Whittle referred to personal attacks on Nuttall. There were plenty of those in the campaign, but these were merely ones that involved uncovering the truth behind various claims the Ukip leader had made, from where he lived to whether he had lost close friends in the Hillsborough disaster. He did concede, however, that perhaps it had been a mistake for Nuttall to stand in the seat:

‘If there was one mistake we made it was that maybe Paul shouldn’t have run so early. I accept that, maybe, because he’s only been leader for 12 weeks.’

People needed to get to know Nuttall, he explained. Given how much emerged during the Stoke campaign, this does not bode particularly well. Whittle also implied that Ukip was still having an impact on national debate by forcing the parties to talk about controls on immigration, almost as though the party can survive better as a pressure group, albeit one that stands candidates in elections.

While Whittle was speaking, someone who seemed much happier when working in a pressure group than a party – Baroness Chakrabarti – was in the green room in Broadcasting House rehearsing her long list of all the people, things and nebulous concepts that needed blaming and correcting for the party losing Copeland.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.


Unlock more articles



Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in