Henry Jeffreys

Sorry, Champagne, but cider is the original fizz

The techniques that create Champagne were born in the forgotten cider boom of the 17th century,says <em>Henry Jeffreys</em>

issue 21 September 2013

It has become a commonplace fact, beloved of pub quizzes, that an Englishman, Christopher Merret, invented Champagne. There is even an element of truth to it: Merret gave a paper to the Royal Society in 1672 outlining how to make wine fizzy. But he wasn’t the first to induce bubbles in a bottle. In the West Country, scientifically inclined gentlemen had been doing it for years — only they used cider, not wine.

In the 17th century there was a wine crisis in England. Home-grown vines had been killed by prolonged cold weather — something now known as the Little Ice Age — and imports were severely curtailed because of wars with France, the Netherlands and Spain. The problem became acute when Cromwell passed the Navigation Act of 1651. This was designed to stop Dutch shipping to England — and the Dutch controlled the trade in all German and a great deal of French wine. There was also a very high excise duty. And so affordable wine became scarce in England. What was needed was an alternative.

In his 1664 paper ‘Pomona’ John Evelyn had the answer: ‘Our design is relieving the want of wine, by a succedaneum of Cider.’ This paper became a sort of bible to a new wave of cider producers looking to turn a peasant drink into something finer. Just as with wine, the variety of fruit was all-important. The most prestigious apple, the pinot noir of cider if you will, was called ‘Redstreak’ or ‘Scudamore crab’ after its propagator, the Herefordshire notable Sir John Scudamore. It would have been inedible raw, being high in tannin and extremely hard, but it was perfect for making fine, high-alcohol ciders designed for keeping. These became known as ‘Vin de Scudamore’, and their reputation quickly spread. It was noted how ‘a barrel of Redstreak surpassed the best Spanish and French wines’.

Illustration Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in