The coalition’s plans to privatise Britain’s woodlands have received what is
euphemistically termed ‘a mixed reception’. Caroline Spelman’s consultation document and accompanying
article in today’s Times (£) may change that fact. Both are historically conscious and upholstered with
reassuring pastoral interludes – an elegant departure from most ministerial rambles.
But, this government’s politics breaks well clear from the literary immersion. There is a dose of Thatcherism. Spelman is adamant that the state should not be managing forests, and she wants private companies to exploit commercially valuable forests. She writes: ‘It’s time for the Government to step back and allow those who are most involved with England’s woodlands to play a much greater role in their future.’
There is a much stronger measure of decentralisation. Local people, charities and campaign groups can use planning controls to ensure that heritage woodland and wildlife is protected.
Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate, free for a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first month free.
UNLOCK ACCESS Try a month freeAlready a subscriber? Log in