Peter Hoskin

Supplementary notes on Osborne’s progressive speech

Earlier, I wrote that Osborne’s speech today seemed to be a significant moment for Project Cameron.  Having attended the Demos event a few hours ago, I still think that’s the case.  Sure, there wasn’t anything particularly new in it – and the delivery didn’t quite zing – but its central point that Brown’s approach to the public finances is regressive, while spending cuts and the right reforms could deliver better services for all, is a necessary refinement of the Tory message.  Come election time, Brown is going to deploy all kinds of attacks on the “nasty Tories” and their “cuts in frontline services”, so it’s important for Cameron & Co. that they counter this in advance.

Here, for the record, are a couple of supplementary points that I jotted in my notebook while listening to Osborne:

The reform argument has always been the progressive argument.  In some respects, it’s quite frustrating to hear Osborne stressing now how cuts needn’t mean worse services; how public service reform can actually deliver better services for all, while reducing costs.  Why wasn’t he forcing this same point a couple of years ago, instead of committing to Labour’s spending targets?  Sure, the fiscal position has worsened since.  But Brown was still spending, borrowing, spending back then, and often for limited returns.  The arguments for why reform is necessary and desirable are the same arguments for why it was necessary and desirable five years ago.  

More charitably, I guess these arguments are better made late than never.  The great service that the next government can do for politics, as well as for the British public, is to completely destroy the old consensus that public spending is a good thing in and of itself. 

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in