Dominic Cummings isn’t resigning – or, at least, not by choice. That much is crystal clear from No. 10’s statement that ‘Mr Cummings believes he behaved reasonably and legally’. But it is striking that there is no endorsement from Boris Johnson or the government saying that it was appropriate for him to drive 250 miles with his spouse, who had Covid-19 symptoms, rather than quarantining for 14 days in their London home.
So the debate about whether he should quit will rage for a bit. It seems to me, the competing arguments are these: his defence is that he was doing what all parents would do, which is trying to protect his four-year-old child in the event both parents fell seriously ill with Covid-19, by going to a place where his sister could look after his son, should the worst happen. He drove before the symptoms laid him low, and when he got there he stayed in a house separate from his parents, who are in their seventies, and separate from his sister. And my goodness, according to the account of how ill he then became given by his spouse Mary Wakefield in The Spectator a month ago, he really did then become dangerously unwell.
The charge against him is that he risked transmitting the dreadful virus to another part of the country by driving so long and far, because Mary Wakefield was already conspicuously unwell with Covid-19 symptoms. However, Cummings says that the police have not – as reported – talked to either him or any member of his family about whether he breached the rules with his escape from north London to the north east. That said, the question of police involvement always looked like a slight red herring to me. The bigger issue is all about the tension between the public and private responsibilities of powerful officials such as Cummings.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
UNLOCK ACCESSAlready a subscriber? Log in