Robert Taylor

The IMF is right: we should be retiring at 70

(Image: iStock)

The IMF is onto something – a sentence I’ve never uttered before. But that august institution says today’s 70-year-olds not only have the cognitive functions 53-year-olds had back in 2000, but are faster, stronger and more energetic than ever.

In other words, 70 isn’t really old anymore. Ergo, says the IMF, a little self-servingly, we should carry on working until at least then, rather than calling it a day at 66, as we do in the UK, and receiving a triple-locked pension that costs a fortune. If there’s one big drag on economic growth, this is it, not just in the UK but around the western world.

At around £125 billion a year, state pensions are responsible for a staggering 10 per cent or so of all government expenditure

Harsh as it sounds, it makes sense. At around £125 billion a year, state pensions are responsible for a staggering 10 per cent or so of all UK government expenditure.

Britain’s best politics newsletters

You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Written by
Robert Taylor
Robert Taylor is a journalist and communications consultant who has carried out a range of training courses for the Falkland Islands’ government.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in