Peter Hoskin

The Lib Dem tuition fee confusion continues

The Lib Dem tuition fee confusion continues
Text settings
Comments

Who knows how, and whether, Vince Cable is going to vote in next Thursday's tuition fee decider? Not even the man himself, it seems. A few days ago he suggested he might abstain for the sake of party unity. Yesterday, he told his local paper that "I have a duty as a minister to vote for my own policy – and that is what will happen." And yet this morning's Guardian has a "party source" saying, "a final decision has not been made. It is still possible Vince could abstain." At least we haven't heard that he might vote against the proposal – although, at this rate, I wouldn't be surprised.

To my mind, the most likely outcome – and one mooted in the papers today – is a three-way split. That is: Lib Dem ministers voting for the government's policy; most Lib Dem backbenchers abstaining as per the coalition agreement; and a handful of disgruntled Charles Kennedy types voting against it. From the Lib Dems' perspective, it is not an ideal outcome, and enables their opponents to mock them as internally riven. But, then, there is little about this situation that is ideal for the Lib Dems, and other outcomes could be more damaging in the long-run. If, for instance, Lib Dem ministers chose to abstain, then they would dilute their party's claim to be a credible member of government.

Coalition does rather entail messy, uncertain situations such as this. But Cable may still look back on the past few months, and wish he'd kept some of his deliberations behind locked doors. From proposing a graduate tax to backing down from it, from abstaining on tuition fees to voting for them, the Business Secretary has hardly been a model of consistency.