It was inevitable, after the Mair interview and the Cockerell profile, that Boris would dominate the news this morning. Steve Richards and Hugo Rifkind (£) have written about him in their columns, and there are numerous reviews of Cockerell’s programme to read – Paul Goodman at ConHome will make for a thoughtful and entertaining lunchtime break.
I don’t think that Cockerell’s programme told eagle-eyed political observers anything new; but that was not its intention, at least from Boris’ perspective. Eddie Mair wondered if Boris is nasty piece of work; most viewers of Cockerell’s programme would have emerged with the view that Boris is at worst a naughty piece of work. The most telling contribution came from Ken Livingstone; who remarked, not without a note of resentment, that Boris makes people feel better about themselves; adding that this is a rare quality in a politician, which allows Boris to excuse his foibles.
Livingstone’s statement essentially agreed with Boris’ assertion, stated at regular intervals throughout the show, that his private life is irrelevant to his public life. In other words, it doesn’t lose him elections. There are, of course, doubts as to whether that rule would apply to a Tory leadership election and a general election. But, as the contents of Benedict Brogan’s brilliant column in this morning’s Telegraph suggests, the question is beginning to merit serious consideration.
Comments