Ross Clark Ross Clark

The rebel MPs don’t know what they want

Was there ever such a principled stand over a such a feeble cause? If today’s Tory rebels were intent on overturning the 2016 referendum result because, in all their conscience, they could support a policy of leaving the EU, I would not agree with what they were doing, but I would have some grudging respect for it.

Instead, what is the great issue at stake in today’s vote? Another extension of Article 50 to 31 January. Yep, another three whole months in the EU. But to what purpose? The rebels can’t come up with a more specific demand because they do not know or cannot agree on what they want. Some want to remain, others think we should leave but do not know how. So they coalesce around a compromise cause which makes no sense at all – which instead seeks merely to prolong the agony, create more drift, makes the space for yet more hours of Parliamentary debate in which they can agree on absolutely nothing.

This is exactly what happened last time that MPs seized control of the Commons order paper, in March. Rebellious MPs had their moment to wield their authority, stamp their mark on the nation’s future – and they ended up supporting nothing. They could agree on what they didn’t want, but not on what they did. They voted down a second referendum, various brands of Norway-style arrangement, as well as Theresa May’s deal and cancelling Article 50. They want to abolish the default position – no deal – yet without any replacement default, nor any idea of what they would want it to be the default position from.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in