No one, especially me, has comprehended the Big Society in its entirety. As far as I can
gather, the state will shed some of its bureaucratic armour, but there is no clue as to where it will be dispensed. Writing in today’s Times, Rory Stewart, whose constituency contains one of the ‘Vanguard Communities; attempts a definition. He writes:
Collective action already exists in Britain. People group together to re-paint the Village Hall; they organise a school run; they teach knitting to the inmates of Wandsworth Prison. Voluntarism is primarily a moral or community response – it would have been described as ‘Common Christian Kindness’ in another era – it is uninterested in government, which has been left to the representatives of the people. Therefore, it’s odd that Cameron and Stewart have excluded county and borough councils from their vision of the Big Society.‘It is about decentralisation, but without giving more power to county councils. It is not necessarily about charities or even the private sector. It’s about collective action.’
Local government is voluntarism in action – many councillors work for free – and it is hardly the best advert. But, despite the waste and incompetence (which must be addressed, along with an anti-competitive bias), local government provides vital services that people do not have the time to do themselves. Who, Phillip Johnston asks, ‘wants to take over responsibility for libraries or housing estates? Would we not rather our councils continued to manage the service – only better?’
He’s right. Decentralised power must flow somewhere, and it will reach your hearth if it has bypassed local government. And we return to the questions of time. Voluntarism and collective action are highly beneficial, but they are generally small scale and rarely if ever permanent.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
UNLOCK ACCESSAlready a subscriber? Log in