For years the government has appeared to be setting itself up for failure with its promises to crack down on illegal immigration. The plan to process asylum claims in Rwanda was always going to excite immigration lawyers. Sure enough, it remains mired in the legal process. Even if the government wins its case in the Supreme Court, there remains the vast obstacle of the European Court of Human Rights.
The promise to ‘stop the boats’ was a hostage to fortune. The boats continue to arrive; it is not possible to patrol every square inch of the English Channel. The discovery of legionella bacteria on the Bibby Stockholm, the barge on which the government is planning to house asylum seekers, seemed at the time to be the final straw for the hapless Home Office.
And yet there are glimmers of hope that the government’s strategy might finally be working. At the start of the year, the Border Force expected 65,000 asylum -seekers to arrive on small boats during 2023. The real number now looks like being half that: 26,000 have arrived so far, two-thirds of the number who had come by this stage last year. Meanwhile there are reports that the processing of applications has sped up. The government was able to announce this week that 100 hotels will no longer be used to house asylum seekers.
This may be too late to revive the Conservatives’ electoral fortunes. To judge by last week’s by-elections in Tamworth and Mid Bedfordshire, many voters have already decided that this government has run its course. Anyone who lives in a town where the main hotel has been turned over to asylum applicants – leading to lost jobs, cancelled weddings and a sense of decay – is unlikely to be impressed by the latest statistics, or even notice that there has been a substantial fall in arrivals.
The real opponents of efforts to tackle illegal migration are not in France but in Britain
Even so, it is important to acknowledge success, and as a magazine which has often been critical of government migration policy, we are pleased to be in a position to do so.

Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in