Ross Clark Ross Clark

The uncomfortable truth about the end of UK coal

Ratcliffe-on-Soar power station (photo: iStock)

Should we celebrate the end of Ratcliffe-on-Soar, Britain’s last coal-fired power station, whose boilers went cold on Monday, bringing to an end 142 years of coal-fired electricity in Britain? Even as recently as 2012, 39 per cent of our electricity came from coal. 

The news of the power station’s demise was, predictably enough, received with great enthusiasm by the climate lobby, who asserted that renewables had displaced this filthy form of generation. According to Lord Deben, the former Chair of the Climate Change Committee, the end of coal power in Britain will inspire the rest of the world to follow suit.

Coal is undoubtably a dirty fuel, producing around twice as much carbon dioxide as gas when used to generate an equivalent amount of electricity – not to mention large quantities of acid rain-causing sulphur dioxide. But before the history of coal in Britain is finally laid to rest, let’s look at the case against its hurried demise. 

Before the history of coal in Britain is finally laid to rest, let’s look at the case against its hurried demise

Firstly, if the rest of the world is going to be inspired by the decommissioning of Britain’s coal-fired plants there is little sign of it yet.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in