A gaggle of academics have written to the Observer to condemn the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) for accepting £100m from the government. The AHRC is conducting research into the big society, and the allegation is that the settlement was conditional, an allegation which is denied. Doubtless the 69 signatories are dons of the tweedily conservative variety, but their objections perhaps explain why Cameron’s flagship policy is so mistrusted. They write:
The big society envisages a nation where the government quietly facilitates voluntarism, community and charity to create more efficient public services that are held in direct public ownership, free from the oligarchy of unaccountable bureaucrats. It should be the quintessence of democracy in action. Yet, from this to the forestry furore, it has never escaped the allegation of being an ideological cover for a radically smaller state, a threat to the constitution no less.‘When academic research is used to promote party political ideologies its quality and value decline. It also threatens democracy and the constitution. While academic work may be partly paid for out of public funds, this ought not to be the same thing as working for the government.’
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
UNLOCK ACCESSAlready a subscriber? Log in