William Hague’s statement on Prism was a masterclass in not answering the question. Hague calmly, but determinedly, stuck to the line that he wasn’t going to comment on leaks — which made the whole statement slightly pointless as it was being given in response to a leak. His whole approach was ‘trust me’, which will work with those who do trust me but do nothing to reassure those who don’t trust him, government or the security services.
Hague begun by dropping a heavy hint that attacks on the Olympics had been foiled by GCHQ/NSA cooperation. He also went out of his way to deny the accusation that GCHQ and the NSA were using each other to leapfrog the legal obstacles to them spying on British and American citizens respectively.
For the most part, the Commons seemed content with Hague’s terse replies. But Douglas Alexander did look irritated by Hague’s open refusal to answer pretty much all of the questions that he had put to the Foreign Secretary.
Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in