Ross Clark Ross Clark

We can reduce carbon emissions, but we can’t afford Labour’s targets

If Britain is to meet its self-imposed carbon-reduction targets it means the end of coal by 2030. Things aren’t looking much brighter for the coalition. The deep fissure between Liberal Democrat-driven green policy and Conservative-driven business policy has become clear at the Spectator Energy Conference today. Ed Davey has bunked off, with his office saying he is in China.

Actually he is preparing for this afternoon’s announcement in the Commons, and energy minister Michael Fallon has been sent instead. Both halves of the coalition have rapidly stitched up a deal to cut energy bills by £50. But the Lib Dems won’t tolerate a reversal of decarbonisation targets. That makes a sensible energy policy impossible. As Peter Atherton of Liberium Capital told the conference meeting the current target of reducing carbon emissions by 60 per cent by 2030 will require between £360 billion and £410 billion of new investment in new generating kit – that is 10 HS2s.

It simply isn’t possible to finance this capacity at a price that the consumer will be prepared to bear.

Unlock unlimited access, free for a month

then subscribe from as little as £1 a week after that
SUBSCRIBE

The problem is not that reducing carbon emissions is unaffordable; it is the severity of the target. We could reduce carbon emissions substantially by investing in new gas plants and retiring coal – as has happened in the US – by improving efficiency
of homes and vehicles But to go the last few percentage points to reach a 60 per cent reduction by 2030 is fantastically expensive.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in