Peter Hoskin

Why IDS is right raise the link between immigration and worklessness

Before everyone gets too excited, Iain Duncan Smith is not saying in his speech today that immigration is a bad thing in itself. But he is saying that it has consequences, some of which impinge on native Brits. Many of these consequences are, as it happens, writ in the official statistics. As IDS highlights – and as Coffee House has detailed before – a good number of the jobs that sprang up during the New Labour years were accounted for by immigration; and there are signs that the process is continuing still. This is one of the reasons why the number of jobs in the economy can increase, while the dole queues barely shorten. Workers are imported, rather than nurtured.

This isn’t the fault of the immigrants themselves: they are selling their skills as well they might, and to willing buyers too. But IDS’s suggestion that immigration needs to be “controlled” nonetheless is nothing new. It was, for instance, the policy of the last government to prioritise certain skilled immigrants over others. One rationale they gave for this was to “maintain the highest possible levels of British graduate employment.” Even the Lib Dems, who will no doubt be wary of IDS’s speech today, called for measures to “manage migration” in their manifesto, including a “regional points-based system to ensure that migrants can work only where they are needed.”

Which leaves IDS’s exhoration that British employers give British workers a chance – and “not just fall back on labour from abroad” – as perhaps the most eyecathing passage of his speech. British employers might reply, in turn, that they do give British workers a chance, but they are often found lacking in comparison to their foreign counterparts.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.


Unlock more articles



Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in