Mark Cocker

Why the cheating cuckoo may finally be getting its comeuppance

The ornithologist Mark Cocker is full of admiration for Nick Davies’s Cuckoo — as gripping as any detective story

Author Tom McCarthy Photo: Getty 
issue 21 March 2015

In recent years there has been a fashion for so-called ‘new nature writing’, where the works are invariably heavy with emotion, while the descriptions of place and wildlife often serve as a hazy green backcloth against which the author depicts the main subject —their own personalities.

It comes as something of a shock, therefore, to find a new nature book that returns to a traditional format. It’s one in which the character of the writer barely intrudes and the real subject, picked apart in meticulous detail, is nature itself. In the hands of a scholar who is also a first-rate storyteller, you realise just how entertaining such a work can be. Nick Davies’s Cuckoo is a model of that genre — part gripping detective story, part evocation of place and season, but also a glorious reminder of the sheer wonder of our planet and all its strange life forms.

Yet it is hard to imagine a more fascinating theme. The cuckoo’s cultural place in Britain is loaded with superlatives. It’s the source of the oldest song in the language (‘Sumer is icumen in’) and, aside from the lark and nightingale, it has also given rise to the greatest body of folklore, myth and literary reference of any bird. However, what makes the creature such a tailor-made topic for the behavioural ecologist is the weirdness of its reproductive strategy, which Gilbert White called ‘a monstrous outrage on maternal affection’.

Based at Wicken Fen, the National Trust reserve in Cambridgeshire, Davies has unravelled some of the key mysteries of this secretive creature. It was not until the 1920s that ornithologists even knew how female cuckoos got their eggs into the nests of their unsuspecting hosts. Two false theories had sufficed for decades: that they either laid them on the ground and then regurgitated them or popped them in with their beaks.

GIF Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in