Steven Barrett

Why the ECJ still has a role to play in Britain’s lawmaking

(Getty images)

Now that Britain has left the EU, we are no longer bound by the European Court of Justice. Some may view that as something to celebrate. Yet there may also be downsides.

The ECJ is the final court of the EU. It hears lots of cases about EU member states who break EU law. It then reaches conclusions which form case law. All 27 members of the EU are bound by this, but Britain, outside the EU, is not. But here’s the catch: some of those decisions might actually be good ones. The solution is that we should borrow these good ones for ourselves.

English law is a magpie. We pick up shiny bits of ‘good law’ that other places have and we make them ours. It is what lots of sensible sovereign states do, and there is nothing wrong with this. There is no copyright in law. After Cain and Abel, no country got to call dibs on having a law against murder and then charge royalties to all the others countries who wanted one too. Good laws sell themselves.

Banking law, across the world, is also a magpie. Whole swathes of good laws written by people we pay for (the FCA) are put on websites. Other nations see them. They think they are good (they are). They highlight them, they hold down Ctrl-C, they press Ctrl-V. They copy our laws in to their own.

The UK is very lucky in law. We don’t only acquire useful law by copy and paste. Sometimes we take the person too. Lord Hoffmann was one of our best ever commercial judges.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.


Unlock more articles



Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in