Politics

Read about the latest UK political news, views and analysis.

Politics | 11 October 2008

Gordon Brown’s critics are confused. For months they have been accusing him of dithering, of timidity, of being unable to make the bold moves that are needed if his government is to get a grip on the unfolding problems in the financial sector and, now, in the economy as a whole. Now that he has shown more than a bit of both decisiveness and courage by bringing Peter Mandelson back from what most fair-minded people recognise is a credible stint as European trade commissioner, the critics have shifted gears. Mandelson is not the man to help craft policies with which to fight the emerging economic crisis because… well, because he

Alex Massie

“Ambition” is the new “Uppity”

Sarah Palin on Barack Obama and Bill Ayers today: This pattern raises serious questions about Senator Obama’s judgment.  It raises serious questions about his truthfulness.  But there is no question about his ambition. Ambition explains launching your political career in the living room of an unrepentant terrorist. Indeed. Because you too would start your decades-long conspiracy to steal the Presidency in the home of an “unrepentent terrorist”. That’s a sensible ambition! Who could possibly fail to see that? Doesn’t Obama’s association – no more than that – with Ayers undermine the “he’s a secret terrorist-sympathiser” narrative? Or have we, I suppose, now reached the point where the GOP skips the

The FTSE takes a hammering

At close of play, the FTSE was down a hefty 8.85 percent – putting it below the 4000 mark, and sealing what has been the worst week for the index since 1987.  No.s 10 and 11 will be praying furiously for a change in the tide.  As I wrote earlier, the longer this market slump goes on, the more their bailout package will appear to be one colossal waste of public moolah.  Problem is, investors are panicking over the prospect of a global recession – and there’s very little Brown and Darling can do to change that.

Who does Brown think he is?

Is our Great Leader getting delusions of grandeur? He told the BBC earlier today that “We’ve had some success in getting the price of oil down …” So not only is Gordon Brown “leading the world” in bank bailouts and moving markets as he does so (mainly downwards, sadly), but now he (who even uses the royal “we”) thinks he controls the price of oil.   It is, of course, an absurd conceit. G Brown no more controls oil prices than he does the movement of the planets. Oil prices have tumbled (to as low as $80 today) because the markets (and now the IMF) think we’re heading for a

Darling’s gamble

Alistair Darling’s refusal to guarantee the savings of those councils and other bodies which have money tied up in Icelandic banks could have some particularly nasty side effects.  Writes the Times: “…The Times learnt that some town halls were considering withdrawing all their cash from private institutions and putting it into more secure Government bonds. If dozens of councils follow suit this could lead to a damaging run on the banks, local government experts cautioned. Westminster and Kensington and Chelsea, two top London councils, said that they were looking at this option. Tony Travers, of the London School of Economics, said: ‘Local authorities hold tens of billions of pounds in

Brown’s get-out plan

Is this the sound of Brown changing his story?  Seems to me he’s deploying a slightly different version of his “I’m trying to get other world leaders to follow my lead” theme.  Here’s what he said in a BBC interview earlier, explaining why the fruits of his financial labours will only start showing up in the medium term: “What we need now – as I said this morning – is other countries to do similar things [to our bailout package], because this is a global financial system.” It’s a subtle but significant shift.  The implication being that if other countries don’t do “whatever it takes”, then our bailout may not have the

The early signs aren’t promising for Brown

It’s down, down, down for the markets – and how.  The Dow Jones closed down by 7.33 percent; Nasdaq down 5.47 percent; and the Nikkei down 9.62 percent.  Whilst the DAX is currently down by 9.25 percent, and our very own FTSE has plummeted by 7.34 percent. What’s more, three-month LIBOR rates – the rates at which banks tend to lend to each other – aren’t showing much sign of downwards momentum after the series of coordinated interest-rate cuts by central banks. Of course, it’s early days as far as the bailout package is concerned, but these latest indicators do suggest that the banks, the brokers and the analysts have their eyes

Why Brown is so happy

There is something unnerving about seeing Gordon Brown smile so much on television. Yesterday he saddled the British public with more debt than any peacetime Prime Minister – taking a massive gamble with money the public haven’t even earned yet. What’s he got to smile about? Well he believes that he has finally moulded the crisis into a party political weapon and whacked David Cameron with it. There is now plenty of polling evidence that the crisis is playing into his hands. Just three weeks ago, the Tories had a 17 point lead on economic competence (YouGov/Telegraph). After more news cycles dominated by the financial crisis this had narrowed to

Clegg adopts the right level of cooperation

The most impressive moment in yesterday’s PMQ’s came courtesy of an unlikely source – Nick Clegg.  The Lib Dem leader generally toed the “we’ll cooperate with the Government” line, but he also stirred in a punchy addendum: that some of the money Brown’s splashing around might be better spent on reducing the tax burden for low-income earners. I happen to agree with him, but – whatever your views on that front – there’s little denying that Clegg’s found a message which enables the Lib Dems to operate in a spirit of cooperation whilst also saying something a little bit different and eye-catching.  After all, post-10p tax, there’s scant chance that Brown will dismiss Clegg’s concerns with a “Shut up, you’re meant to be working with us” response –

Fraser Nelson

Questions, questions, questions

Ben Brogan in today’s Daily Mail goes on precisely the right theme: translating these squillions into the real money – £16,000 per punter. The “that’s our money” anger picked up in the vox-pops around the country from members of the public has no echo in Parliament. This worries me – there’s something like £400 billion at stake here, and more scrutiny is required. It’s times like this I wish we had an American system, with a directly-elected prime minister, appointed Cabinet and separate legislature with its own mandate. America had plenty voices speaking up for its deeply suspicious taxpayers. In Britain, we don’t. I’m not saying I’m against the bailout.

Fraser Nelson

A Swedish-inspired plan

Sweden really does rule. What Mervyn King and Gordon Brown have agreed today is, essentially, the Swedish 1992 bank bailout plan, (NYT write-up here). It was authored by the same conservative government which introduced the voucher school model that the Tories are proposing to replicate. While the UK bailout is comparable to the Paulson plan in the US (adjusting for the size of the respective economies) in terms of scale, it is a far better plan. And this is where Gordon Brown does deserve some credit. Instead of buying toxic waste, as Paulson proposes, the UK taxpayer is injecting capital and taking preference shares. This means that if the economy

Fraser Nelson

Bailout blues

Three thoughts on the bailout… 1) Should the Lloyds-HBOS deal still go ahead? Originally, Brown agreed to waive the competition concerns because HBOS might collapse on its own – but after today’s deal, there’s no danger of that. The bailout gets HBOS out of the very particular pickle it was in. As Robert Peston notes, Lloyds is suddenly looking like getting a rare chance to hoover up a third of the market, based on an promise made for reasons that are no longer valid. So this “get out of competition commission free” card which Brown gave his friend Victor Blank may be worth quite a fair bit. Hence shares of

Fraser Nelson

PMQs report: Brown gets away with it

It’s unfair to say Brown “won” PMQs because Cameron decided not to play. There was a distinct air of national crisis to PMQs which, of course, helps Gordon Brown. Few amongst us would be so bold as to think the taxpayer will see this £50 billion again, but David Cameron was not going to point this out. His problem through all of this is an inability to say what he’d do differently. The rating of leaders rises during wartime, fear heightens collectivist instincts so this all benefits Brown. His mission is to talk up this idea of an economic war – but at the moment he doesn’t need much help.

Live blog: PMQs

1157, Peter Hoskin: Welcome to Coffee House’s live blog of the first PMQs of this Parliamentary session (you can watch it here).  Expect a lot of back-and-forth about the £50 billion bailout, all in a spirit of aggressive cooperation.  And stay tuned for Fraser’s detailed report later. 1204, PH: Here we go… 1204, PH: Brown confirms that interest rates have been cut by 0.5 percent.  That could be the most significant thing to come out of this PMQs. 1206, PH: First question from Robert Goodwill – “Does the PM agree with the IMF that the economy will contract next year?” Brown’s response: the usual “Every across the world is facing this…”

The £50 billion bailout: Brown’s statement

You can watch Brown’s statement on the bailout here.  It’s full of the usual reminders about “global problems” which “started in America”, and platitudes about “fresh and innovative intervention” and “long-term challenges”.  But, to be honest, this is an arena in which Brown thrives.  His dour bank manager shtick lends itself to talk about liquidity, assets and guarantees.  The question now is whether voters and companies are convinced by it. MARKET UPDATE: The FTSE is down 4.51 percent at 10:35.

Will the rescue plan work?

What to make of Brown and Darling’s £50 billion rescue plan for the banks? As with so much during this financial crisis, there’s a distinct air of uncertainty around it. There are potential upsides: it should help restore some degree of confidence in the banking system, help banks lend to each other, and stabilise the markets. But there are potential downsides as well, including: 1) Debt. The £50billion will be funded by increased national borrowing. And there could be more on top of that if HMT ever has to act on its promise to underwrite loans between the banks. As Fraser’s pointed out, the deficit is already daunting enough. This latest could