Politics

Read about the latest UK political news, views and analysis.

Squeezed out

Today’s YouGov poll for the Mirror tells a similar story to those released at the weekend – i.e. fairly unimpressive Labour gains, given the wall-to-wall coverage Brown’s enjoyed recently.  But there’s a chapter to that story that I didn’t pick up on in my post of a couple of days ago – and that’s just how poor the numbers are for the Lib Dems. They’re on 14 percent today, and were stuck on 16 percent in yesterday’s ComRes poll.  It’s similar to how they’ve been polling for the last few months.  But what makes the latest numbers stand out is that they come on the back of a couple of good weeks for the party – perhaps the best since Nick Clegg

Brown counts on the Sarah Effect

According to today’s Daily Record, Sarah Brown is set to “spearhead” the Labour campaign in Glenrothes.  It’s hardly suprising news – talk of her involvement has been doing the Westminster rounds since her much-vaunted cameo at last month’s Labour party conference.  But it shouldn’t be forgotten that this is far from normal practice.  As the Record points out, “It’s believed Sarah will be the first Prime Minister’s wife to actively campaign during a by-election”; raising all kinds of questions about how involved PM’s partners should be in the political process.  Whether they’ll undermine the “Sarah Effect” remains to be seen.

Recession bites

Although it comes as little surprise, the warning from the Ernst & Young Item Club that the UK is already in recession is the most significant confirmation that we’ve had so far about the poor state of our economy. Using the same forecasting model as the Treasury, they also predict that inflation is set to fall – giving more scope for interest rate cuts – and that the economy will start growing again in 2010. The question remains about what the political effects of recession will be. Will a prolonged downturn erode the Our Saviour Brown narrative, along with the poll gains he’s made over the past few weeks? Or have Brown and

Just in case you missed them… | 20 October 2008

Here are some of the posts made over the weekend on Spectator.co.uk… Fraser Nelson asks whether Cameron’s VAT plan is legal. James Forsyth claims that the Office of Budget Responsibility could be a useful political shield for the Tories, and points out that the real economy will soon be hit by the crisis. Peter Hoskin suggests that the Cameroons need to be blunter, and asks what to make of Phil Woolas’s immigration claim. Clive Davis reports on Colin Powell’s endorsement of Barack Obama. Melanie Phillips writes on Winston Smith’s Britain. And Americano wonders whether the financial crisis has catalysed the globalisation process.

Fraser Nelson

Is Cameron’s VAT plan legal?

Much as though I applaud David Cameron’s plan to give struggling small companies a VAT holiday, a rather large obstacle occurs to me. Wouldn’t this be illegal under European Union law? The Sixth EU VAT Directive mandates all states to apply VAT the same way as long as the main rate is a minimum of 15% and the discounted rate at least 5%. Room for manoeuvre was tightened to almost zero two years ago in the EU Recast Sixth Directive. You don’t mess with this, as the Blair government found out when it lost its fight to grant companies the right to reclaim VAT spent on fuel. So how will

What to make of Darling’s spending spree?

Just as with Phil Woolas’s immigration claim, there are a whole load of question marks hovering around Alistair Darling’s revelation that the Government will boost public spending to help support the economy.  The biggest of them is simply: will it work?  And, to be honest, there’s no set answer to that.  Only time will tell.  It is ominous, though, that Keynesian injections of cash didn’t do much to help Japan a decade ago. But then there are the particulars.  Darling claims that the money will be taken out of future Budgets, but paid for by extra borrowing now.  Will this mean a significant reduction in future spending projections?  Can we

Tomorrow’s polls today

The results from a couple of tomorrow’s opinion polls have hit the good ol’ information superhighway, and they’ll make pretty disappointing reading for Brown & Co.  The first – a ComRes poll for the Independent – puts the Tories on 40 percent (down 1); Labour on 31 percent (up 2); and the Lib Dems on 16 percent (down 2).  Whilst an ICM poll for the News of the World suggests that any Brown bounce is of the “dead cat” variety. Sure, Labour have made some gains – particularly on the economic competence front – but the fact is that after the Our Saviour Brown narrative of the past couple of

The Cameroons need to be blunter

You’ve got to hand it to the Brownite spin operation – for once, their bludgeoning approach seems to be working.  The terms they’ve coined, and which are repeated ad nauseum by Labour figures – “Global financial problem which started in America”; “We’re meeting with world leaders”; and even that “Whatever it takes” chestnut – really do seem to be filtering down to the national consciousness, if some of the latest polling on economic competence is anything to go by. Why?  Well, it’s not because our Dear Leader is economically competent – the past eleven years have put pay to that idea.  I rather suspect it’s because the financial problems we’re

James Forsyth

That was the campaign that was

James Forsyth on how the two candidates earned their party’s nominations and how the final stages of the campaign are playing out It was on the eve of the Iowa caucus, 2 January, that it became clear that Barack Obama’s candidacy was more than just a form of political entertainment. Obama’s last speaking engagement was in a high school gym in Des Moines. It was the hot ticket of a cold night. This was the best orator in a generation giving the most important speech of his political career so far; the youthful crowd were expecting quite a show. But the star attraction had lost his voice. When he tried

Fraser Nelson

Politics | 18 October 2008

Few would dispute that, in the last fortnight, Gordon Brown has shown why he has been a fixture for so long at the very apex of British politics. His economic model has imploded and his debt pyramid collapsed. The taxpayer is up to his neck to the tune of half a trillion pounds to clear up the mess left by the abject failure of the bank regulatory system Brown personally designed. He has taken Britain into recession, with property prices collapsing and unemployment soaring. And yet still the Prime Minister stands politically triumphant, comparing himself to Picasso and Churchill (among other giants) while soaking up the applause of Nobel laureates

Fraser Nelson

Where’s the contrast?

I’ve read and re-read Cameron’s speech on the economy, hoping that I had somehow missed the radical message to answer Gordon Brown. I have given up. Britain is facing a tsunami of unemployment, two years of recession if we’re lucky and what do the Tories have to say? They’ll set up a new quango, and try to tinker with council tax. We had new phrases: instead of “irresponsible capitalism” we’re told there will be “responsible free enterprise”. His dreadful “social responsibility” phrase is making a comeback in the form of “economic responsibility” and remains just as vacuous as a concept. Much of the detail appears worryingly wrong-headed. Cameron seems to say

Generally good

The appointment of Sir General David Richards as head of the British army, effective from August 2009, is the government’s first inspired military appointment for a long time. A former Nato commander in Afghanistan and the “Saviour of Sierra Leone”, General Richards will bring to the job a keen understanding of the military’s new tasks and, from his last assignment as Commander-in-Chief Land Forces, insight into the real state of the British army. Richards is probably the closest thing the British army has to David Petraeus – a soldier with an appreciation of politics, an eye for a good photo opportunity, but also someone who can develop a strategic vision.

Fraser Nelson

The Brown bust: tax

British households are far less able to deal with the credit crunch because taxes have risen by the equivalent of £6,520 per household compared to 1996/97 levels. This ratcheting up of the tax burden has been a steady feature of the Brown years but it is being felt with particular force now. During the boom years, homeowners felt richer as their house price rose at the fastest rate in the OCED and borrowed massively. So now, when the debt tap is choking, millions of households are right up against it because of this higher tax take. A tax cut is, of course, how to help people facing soaring food and

Alex Massie

Oh, Canada…

I’d been meaning to blog about the Canadian elections but then realised that, dash it, despite Canada actually being an interesting place stocked with charming, affable people I really didn’t have very much to say beyond, “hmm, Canada is having another election”. The BBC evidently thought so too since the elections didn’t make the 10 o’clock news last night. Poor form, I think. Still, it’s curious that Canada receives almost no foreign coverage, even in Britain where there are, after all, plenty of people with Canadian relatives or connections. Anyway, it seems that Stephen Harper has not quite pulled it off. ie, the Conservatives have improved their position, but are

Fraser Nelson

An eye catching initiative that I can be personally associated with

Ben Brogan spots this gem from an interview with the Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Jean-Claude Juncker: Gordon Brown “begged” to turn up at the Eurozone meeting last week. Brown desperately wanted to turn up so that could present to a domestic audience this carefully crafted image of Brown the Saviour, the man called in to advise the Eurozone lot. But as Juncker says in the interview: “The British prime minister had to beg to be let into the room in which the euro group was meeting. I’m sure that when the storm is over, the British will think about whether they shouldn’t become an equal in all decision-making bodies.’” This,

Fraser Nelson

The Brown bust: Unemployment

How bad can unemployment get during the Brown Bust? Predictions of two or three million unemployed miss an important point. The concept of the “dole” has changed: unlike in the 1980s it has become a way of life, as well as a safety net. There were 5.2 million on out-of-work benefits last February of which just 806,000 were claiming unemployed benefit. The number of out-of-work, working-age people sustained by the workforce could break six million next year. The progress on tackling what Beveridge memorably called the “giant evil” of idleness was woeful – mainly because 81 percent of the new jobs were either created or taked by immigrants. They may

Fraser Nelson

The illustrated guide to the Brown bust

The Brown Bust: house prices This is the first in a short series on the illustrated Brown Bust, we’ll show you graphs looking at the various aspects of the bursting of the Brown Bubble. After failing to control monetary policy – giving the Bank of England an inflation-only remit – the out-of-control money supply led (as it always does) to an asset bubble which has now burst. This graph shows how spectacularly. In little over a year, UK houses have fallen by 14 per cent – more than they did in six years under the Tories. Both lines are rebased to 100, with 100 being the peak of the market