Politics

Read about the latest UK political news, views and analysis.

Thursday

Peter Hoskin

Clegg adopts the right level of cooperation

The most impressive moment in yesterday’s PMQ’s came courtesy of an unlikely source – Nick Clegg.  The Lib Dem leader generally toed the “we’ll cooperate with the Government” line, but he also stirred in a punchy addendum: that some of the money Brown’s splashing around might be better spent on reducing the tax burden for low-income earners. I happen to agree with him, but – whatever your views on that front – there’s little denying that Clegg’s found a message which enables the Lib Dems to operate in a spirit of cooperation whilst also saying something a little bit different and eye-catching.  After all, post-10p tax, there’s scant chance that Brown will dismiss Clegg’s concerns with a “Shut up, you’re meant to be working with us” response –

Fraser Nelson Fraser Nelson

Questions, questions, questions

Ben Brogan in today’s Daily Mail goes on precisely the right theme: translating these squillions into the real money – £16,000 per punter. The “that’s our money” anger picked up in the vox-pops around the country from members of the public has no echo in Parliament. This worries me – there’s something like £400 billion at stake here, and more scrutiny is required. It’s times like this I wish we had an American system, with a directly-elected prime minister, appointed Cabinet and separate legislature with its own mandate. America had plenty voices speaking up for its deeply suspicious taxpayers. In Britain, we don’t. I’m not saying I’m against the bailout.

Wednesday

Fraser Nelson Fraser Nelson

A Swedish-inspired plan

Sweden really does rule. What Mervyn King and Gordon Brown have agreed today is, essentially, the Swedish 1992 bank bailout plan, (NYT write-up here). It was authored by the same conservative government which introduced the voucher school model that the Tories are proposing to replicate. While the UK bailout is comparable to the Paulson plan in the US (adjusting for the size of the respective economies) in terms of scale, it is a far better plan. And this is where Gordon Brown does deserve some credit. Instead of buying toxic waste, as Paulson proposes, the UK taxpayer is injecting capital and taking preference shares. This means that if the economy

Peter Hoskin

Will the Government follow the IMF?

The Tories tried to make political capital out of the International Monetary Fund’s latest growth forecasts in today’s PMQs.  You can see them on page 2 of this pdf.  What’s so significant about them?  Well, they’re pretty gloomy for starters – they put the UK’s economic growth at only 1.0 percent for 2008, and -0.1 percent for 2009.  And they’re also the most signficant growth predictions made since the financial crisis really blew up a few weeks ago, meaning they’re more likely than most to account for just how bad things are.  Indeed, the 2008 figure is down by 0.8 percent on the forecast made in the IMF’s last World

Fraser Nelson Fraser Nelson

Bailout blues

Three thoughts on the bailout… 1) Should the Lloyds-HBOS deal still go ahead? Originally, Brown agreed to waive the competition concerns because HBOS might collapse on its own – but after today’s deal, there’s no danger of that. The bailout gets HBOS out of the very particular pickle it was in. As Robert Peston notes, Lloyds is suddenly looking like getting a rare chance to hoover up a third of the market, based on an promise made for reasons that are no longer valid. So this “get out of competition commission free” card which Brown gave his friend Victor Blank may be worth quite a fair bit. Hence shares of

Fraser Nelson Fraser Nelson

PMQs report: Brown gets away with it

It’s unfair to say Brown “won” PMQs because Cameron decided not to play. There was a distinct air of national crisis to PMQs which, of course, helps Gordon Brown. Few amongst us would be so bold as to think the taxpayer will see this £50 billion again, but David Cameron was not going to point this out. His problem through all of this is an inability to say what he’d do differently. The rating of leaders rises during wartime, fear heightens collectivist instincts so this all benefits Brown. His mission is to talk up this idea of an economic war – but at the moment he doesn’t need much help.

Peter Hoskin

Live blog: PMQs

1157, Peter Hoskin: Welcome to Coffee House’s live blog of the first PMQs of this Parliamentary session (you can watch it here).  Expect a lot of back-and-forth about the £50 billion bailout, all in a spirit of aggressive cooperation.  And stay tuned for Fraser’s detailed report later. 1204, PH: Here we go… 1204, PH: Brown confirms that interest rates have been cut by 0.5 percent.  That could be the most significant thing to come out of this PMQs. 1206, PH: First question from Robert Goodwill – “Does the PM agree with the IMF that the economy will contract next year?” Brown’s response: the usual “Every across the world is facing this…”

Peter Hoskin

The £50 billion bailout: Brown’s statement

You can watch Brown’s statement on the bailout here.  It’s full of the usual reminders about “global problems” which “started in America”, and platitudes about “fresh and innovative intervention” and “long-term challenges”.  But, to be honest, this is an arena in which Brown thrives.  His dour bank manager shtick lends itself to talk about liquidity, assets and guarantees.  The question now is whether voters and companies are convinced by it. MARKET UPDATE: The FTSE is down 4.51 percent at 10:35.

Peter Hoskin

Will the rescue plan work?

What to make of Brown and Darling’s £50 billion rescue plan for the banks? As with so much during this financial crisis, there’s a distinct air of uncertainty around it. There are potential upsides: it should help restore some degree of confidence in the banking system, help banks lend to each other, and stabilise the markets. But there are potential downsides as well, including: 1) Debt. The £50billion will be funded by increased national borrowing. And there could be more on top of that if HMT ever has to act on its promise to underwrite loans between the banks. As Fraser’s pointed out, the deficit is already daunting enough. This latest could

Fraser Nelson Fraser Nelson

Amid the financial turmoil, Peter versus George is the key battle

The Taverna Agni is one of the more expensive restaurants in Corfu, but one would scarcely expect Peter Mandelson and George Osborne to slum it. As is normal for members of London’s political elite, they found themselves in the same exotic location one August weekend. So they went to chew the kleftiko together and laugh about Gordon Brown. We know that Mr Mandelson ‘dripped pure poison’ about the Prime Minister because the fact was leaked to the press within hours — but no one ran the story. Who, after all, cared about a long-retired spin-doctor named Peter? Scroll forward six weeks and that conversation is front-page news. When Mr Mandelson

Tuesday

Alex Massie Alex Massie

The Problem With Non-Americans

At Culture11 there’s some advice for the candidates before tonight’s “debate.” It’s unlikely much of it will be taken. At her own blog Kerry Howley adds this: I’ll just add that there is a massive gap between Obama’s actual rhetoric and the conservative portrayal of him as some sort of naive, starry-eyed internationalist. There is no globalist in this election, naive or otherwise. There is the candidate who insists that foreigners are bloodthirsty killers, and the one who keeps reminding you that foreigners will shutter your factories, poison your children, and destroy your domestic motorcycle industry. Yes, yes, I realize that we aren’t supposed to listen when the Obama campaign

Peter Hoskin

Meetings as theatre

Hold the front pages.  Brown’s just called a “crisis meeting” with Alistair Darling, Mervyn King and Adair Turner, the head of the Financial Services Authority – three people he should be (and is?) in round-the-clock contact with anyway.  Of course, our PM’s been milking this financial crisis for every drop of its theatrical worth all along – few in Westminster think his economic council (which met yesterday, by the way) will actually do anything substantive.  But this latest move deserves its own run in the West End.  Instead, it will most likely get a run in tomorrow’s papers.  If so, mission accomplished for Brown and his cadre of spinners.

Peter Hoskin

Under pressure?

Prepare for the next round of one of Westminster’s favourite parlour games of the past few months: “Will Alistair Darling get the sack?”  After all, our Chancellor’s hardly excelled himself over the past few days — his statement to the Commons yesterday was less-than-inspiring and did nothing to reassure the markets, whilst his behind-the-scenes work seems to amount to little more than dithering — and the thinking is that Gordon Brown will be looking for scapegoats should anything undermine his “serious people for serious times” mantra.  So who’s waiting in the wings?  Three Line Whip’s Iain Martin highlighted one potential candidate earlier, by asking: “Could Peter Mandelson be Chancellor of

Matthew Dancona

Howarth cements the truce

The declaration by George Howarth, the Labour MP for Knowsley North and Sefton East, that “hostilities are over” may not resonate outside the Westminster village but it is highly significant for Gordon Brown’s chances of survival. A Privy Councillor, former junior minister, and select committee stalwart, Howarth is precisely the sort of middle-ranking parliamentarian, little known outside the Commons, who can light the touchpaper that leads to huge political events. In September he wrote unequivocally in the Independent: “I am a loyal supporter of Labour and our Government, so it may be surprising that I believe we now need to have a leadership contest. I nominated Gordon during last year’s

Peter Hoskin

Dithering? Nah, couldn’t be…

Yesterday, I suspected that Alistair Darling’s obfuscating language meant that HMT didn’t really have a clue about how to deal with the market turmoil. But the hope was that, behind the confused – and confusing – rhetoric, there lay substantive action. It would seem not, if the reports of the Chancellor’s meeting with bank officials last night are anything to go by. As Robert Peston outlined on Today this morning, the banks are said to have left infuriated by the lack of any clear plan from the Government. While HMT discovered for the first time that the banks aren’t “too proud” to accept recapitalisation. It’s an astonishing set-up – that,

Monday

Peter Hoskin

Brown’s election climbdown: one year on

As Mike Smithson points out over at the indispensable Political Betting, it’s a year to the day since Gordon Brown called off an Autumn general election in an interview with Andrew Marr.  Watch the footage below to see the moment CoffeeHousers voted as that “where it all went wrong” for our Dear Leader:  

Peter Hoskin

Cameron reshuffles his pack

The Tory reshuffle has taken place, and it’s a small, but welcome, one.  Greg Clark is made the shadow Energy secretary – the equivalent of the role Ed Miliband was given in Brown’s Cabinet reshuffle last week – while Nick Hurd replaces him as shadow Charity Minister.  Clark is one of the brightest rising-stars of the 2005 intake, and Coffee House tipped him for the job last week.  The clashes between him and Miliband should be something to savour.

Daniel Korski

The new defence agenda

The appointment of a new Defence Secretary is one of the best things in Gordon Brown’s reshuffle. Des Browne had grown tired at the MoD, struggling to maintain the respect of the rank and file, battling to oversee two ministerial portfolios and failing to manage crises, like the Iranian capture of British sailors. John Hutton’s appointment is a chance for new thinking. So what should the new defence secretary do in his first 100 days? Here are five ideas. 1) As Charlie Edwards says over on Global Dashboard, John Hutton needs to get himself to Iraq and Afghanistan and take the measure of both campaigns. There is too much confusion

Peter Hoskin

RIP 42-days?

Nick Robinson writes that 42-day detention is “politically dead”, and it’s hard to disagree.  The measure faces the Lords this week and is expected to be voted down by a massive majority, whilst Gordon Brown has allegedly been warned against forcing it through via the Parliament Act.  Any other week, this would be the political story, and Brown would potentially suffer quite a hit from it.  But with all the financial turmoil, the likelihood is that it will remain relatively under-the-radar.  Our PM will be thanking his lucky stars.

Sunday