Society

James Forsyth

A minister for Afghanistan?

The Daily Telegraph reports today that the Tories are thinking about appointing a minister for Afghanistan. The paper says that the “role could be taken by a new appointee possibly a former member of the Armed Forces who would be brought into government by Mr Cameron by making them a peer.” This idea, however, will only work if the Minister is put in charge of all British government work in Afghanistan. If the Minister’s writ only runs in the Ministry of Defence, the move will only succeed in undermining the Defence Secretary. What is needed is someone who has the authority to make sure that the military, diplomatic, and development

James Forsyth

Goodman: Westminster is the author of its decline

If all shadow ministers were as in command of their brief and had thought as much about what they would do in government as Paul Goodman had, I’d feel a lot more confident about how well the next Conservative government would perform. So, I was shocked—and disappointed—when Paul telephoned me a few months back to say that he was standing down as an MP.   Paul is giving up a certain ministerial job and the chance to push through policies that he has thought long and hard about. He’s not doing this because he’s been ensnared in scandal or revealed as a ‘trougher’ or anything like that. But rather because,

Alex Massie

Ricky Ponting Deserves Our Cheers, Not Moronic Boos

Ricky Ponting batting at Edgbaston last week. Photo: Tom Shaw/Getty Images. Three – yes, a whole three –  cheers for Dominic Lawson’s article in the Independent today. He is right: booing Ricky Ponting is disgraceful. There may be a cartoonish element to it all and perhaps the Barmy Army will signal this by cheering the Australian skipper to the echo at the Oval when, we assume, he plays his final test innnings in England, but that’s still not quite good enough. For the time being, too many England cricket fans – not to be confused with supporters of English cricket – seem to have decided that Ponting is some kind

Alex Massie

The Totnes Thunderbolt?

Well, perhaps. And perhaps I was too cynical about the idea of open primaries* being used to select Conservative candidates. Better ti listen to and consider the wisdom of Matthew Parris. A turnout of around 25% is quite impressive for an exercise of this sort even if one might also presume that the novelty of being the first constituency to hold such a contest played a part in boosting enthusiasm. Dr Sarah Wollaston’s victory over two local politicians might be taken as reflecting an anti-politician mood, but it remains to be seen if that sense endures once the Totnes experiement is repeated in other constitutencies. Once the novelty has worn

James Forsyth

Substantial turnout in Totnes open primary

Conservative Home is reporting that turnout in the Totnes open primary is 25 percent. This is quite remarkable and a real vindication of the idea of open primaries: remember that the UK turnout in the European elections was only 34 percent. In Totnes, the Tory majority is less than 2,000. But by holding an open primary, the Tories have created a situation where one in four voters has been involved in the selection of their candidate. This must give the Tory candidate a significant head-start in terms of both name recognition and people feeling connected to them. I suspect that the success of the Totnes experiment means that the Tories

James Forsyth

By being so cheap, Pound devalues himself

The Daily Mirror is very exercised by the fact that David Cameron has 12 secretaries. It reports that Cameron has “five correspondence secretaries, two diary secretaries, a personal assistant, two private secretaries, one assistant private secretary and an office secretary.” This is actually a relatively small number when you consider that Cameron doesn’t, unlike the Prime Minister, have a multitude of civil servants working for him. But Stephen Pound, the quote happy Labour MP, has seen fit to join in with the Mirror’s outrage, telling the paper, “Not even the President of the United States needs 12 secretaries.” Now, a quick look at the White House staff list reveals that

Fraser Nelson

Balls keeps on telling porkies

So, it took me two weeks to get out of the blogging mindset – when you read something outrageous, and start mentally composing a blog. I found out that James and Pete had a bet to see how long I’d last for while on holidays – they reckoned four days. Ha! I was back yesterday, and didn’t blog just to show that I could hold out. But there’s been plenty of temptation during these past two weeks. Not least when my friend Ed Balls tried one of his porkies again. “I actually think it’s an astonishing achievement that we’ve arrested that rise in inequality,” he said two weeks ago. I

Mandelson’s allies stir up trouble for Brown

Gordon will not be pleased.  First, there are rumours that a bunch of Labour MPs want Peter Mandelson to run for the Labour leadership.  And now a “minister close to Lord Mandelson” supplies Rachel Sylvester with a wonderfully snide quote about the way Brown has handled Harriet Harman’s equality bill: “‘It’s so Guardianista,’ says one minister close to Lord Mandelson. ‘You’ve got to admire Harriet’s Killer Driller drive. She’s full of determination but on this she’s wrong. No 10 intervened on her side but I’m not sure Gordon really thought it through. He just said, “Give her what she wants” to get rid of her. It was a bit like

Alex Massie

Royalty is Better than Politics: Naval Department

I hadn’t realised until Matt Yglesias pointed it out that there’s some unhappiness that the US navy’s next aircraft carrier is going to be named after Barry Goldwater and not William Jefferson Clinton. The obvious thing to do, however, is avoid naming ships after politicians at all. This is one area in which the Royal Navy, despite everything, remains vastly superior to its cousins on the other side of the Atlantic. I mean, the new Type 45 Detroyers, HMS Daring and HMS Dauntless have proper naval names as do the submarines Trafalgar, Ambush, Audacious. The new carriers being built – the Queen Elizabeth and the Prince of Wales – take

James Forsyth

The police play dress-up

I think this must count as one of the daftest things I have heard in quite a while: “Two sergeants and a community support officer dressed in head-to-foot burkhas, jilbabs, hijabs and niqabs – with only narrow eye slits to see through as they accompanied four Muslim women. Another officer wore Muslim dress and a head scarf showing her face as part of the scheme, called ‘In Your Shoes’, organised by South Yorkshire Police in Sheffield.” Is this really the best use of police time? Also, I’m distinctly uncomfortable with the British state promoting the idea that the niqab is appropriate dress for Muslim women One of the sergeants, who

James Forsyth

Iran may have crossed the West’s red line – Obama must act

The Times reports today that Iran has perfected the technology needed to make a nuclear bomb and could produce one a year from being given the order to by the Supreme Leader. This is yet another reminder that time is running short when it comes to stopping Iran from going nuclear. Indeed if the Times is right, then Iran has already crossed what used to be regarded as the West’s red line. To date, the Obama administration’s Iran policy has been—to put it mildly—unclear. But the New York Times today discloses that the US has been in conversation with its allies about attempting to use sanctions to prevent Iran from

Oops she did it again.

Following yesterday’s ‘men can’t be left to govern’ comments, John Prescott urged Harman to stop posturing and “get on with the job”. But, lo and behold, she’s at it again the very next day. This time it’s bankers: “Somebody did say… that if it had been Lehman sisters rather than Lehman Brothers then there may not have been as much (financial turmoil).” Again, you’ve got to call her political judgement into question. After yesterday’s outburst and the mini-controversy it engendered, she should have looked to calm the situation. Instead, she exacerbated it. Not wise for someone who’s nominally supposed to be running the country, and who’s trying to build some

More reasons why the Tories should release a second Freud Review

One of the more under-the-radar, but most significant, news stories of the day is Theresa May’s suggestion that the Tories may change the terms of contracts currently being hammered out between the government and welfare-to-work providers: “‘If contracts have not been signed one of the things I’m looking at is making the changes we want to those contracts quickly, so that we would be operating on our welfare reform proposals rather than the government’s,’ she said.” The FT adds that one of the changes might be “smaller upfront payments” for the welfare providers. Why so significant?  Well, because it highlights perhaps the main dilemma that the Tories face on welfare

Gove: the Tories need to clarify what they’re all about<br />

It’s well worth reading Ben Brogan’s lively interview with Michael Gove in the Telegraph today.  On Gove’s part, there’s an explanation of the Tories’ stance on selection in schools; a series of doting compliments about David Cameron (who is, apparently, someone “you could imagine snogging like we did to True by Spandau Ballet”); and he even tips Liam Fox to become a future Tory leader.  To my mind, though, the most noteworthy passage is Gove’s response to a question about Lord Salisbury’s claim that the Tories need to present more policy details: “The former minister ‘raises all the points we are asking ourselves,’ Mr Gove says. ‘Yes, we do need

CoffeeHousers’ Wall 3 August – 9 AugustĀ 

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers’ Wall. For those who haven’t come across the Wall before, it’s a post we put up each Monday, on which – providing your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local

James Forsyth

Gove’s exam paper proposals could drive up standards

The Tory plan to put old exam papers online will show how transparency can drive up standards. By allowing people to easily compare today’s exams with those of twenty, thirty years ago it will make it possible for everyone to judge whether the exams have got easier or not. One of the things that I’ll be most interested in seeing is whether certain exams boards consistently produce less testing papers. It will also be instructive to see how IGCSEs compare to GCSEs and the pre-U to A-Level. I suspect we will find that these new exams — currently only available to independent schools though, the Tories would change this —

James Forsyth

Pickles expects 17 more Tory MPs to stand down at the next election because of expenses

The Guardian has just posted online a Julian Glover piece which will be in tomorrow’s paper. In the piece, Glover says that Eric Pickles has given an interview to Monday’s Guardian in which he says that he expects 17 more Tory MPs to stand down because of the expenses row. (That would bring the total to thirty). This means that 17 fairly plum seats will become available, any seat the Tories won last time they should hold this time. I suspect that the leadership would like to use this opportunity to try and expand its potential ministerial talent pool. There might well be a few clashes over the new powers

The Iraq inquiry should examine bureaucratic as well as political failings

The Iraq Inquiry has now begun. Its chair, John Chilcot, has stressed that he will conduct the inquiry rigorously and, as far as possible, openly. These are sound goals. But I’m concerned about the way the inquiry staff is being organised. Margaret Aldred, a senior Cabinet Office official, will lead the staff effort. That is a real cause for concern. Ms Aldred, originally an MoD official, has been at the heart of British security policy-making in the last couple of years. Though the heads of the Overseas and Defence Secretariat – the PM’s de facto National Security Adviser – have regularly changed, recently from Nigel Sheinwald to Simon McDonald, Ms