Society

Fraser Nelson

Lies, laughter and the e-word in PMQs

So Brown kicked off by praising the Speaker for “unfailing personal kindness to all members of all parties of this house.” And with a straight face too! This kindness was the problem, the way Michael Martin ushered everyone to the Fees Office to claim their Generation Game conveyor belt-style goodies. And then it got worse. Brown says the Royal Mail is “losing 5 million letters a year” – he meant pounds. The House started to softly guffaw, William Hague laughed noiselessly. Brown gets narky: nothing irritates him more than the sound of soft but universal derision. Not the roar of laughter that greeted his “save the banks” – so loud

PMQs live blog | 20 May 2009

Stay tuned for live coverage of PMQs from 1200 onwards.  A perfect opportunity for a round of Brown bingo, methinks. 1201: And we’re off.  He kicks off by paying tribute to the Speaker, praising his 30 years of “public service”, and saying that Michael Martin has shown “unfailing kindness” to MPs on “both sides of the House”.  Hm. 1203: Not good from Brown, as he stumbles over some numbers relating to Royal Mail.  Laughter rings around the House, and the Speaker has to intervene – he singles out Cameron. 1205: Here’s Cameron now.  He also pays tribute to Martin, saying that “everyone wants to thank him for his public service.” 1206: A punchy

Play Brown bingo

This is brilliant. Yesterday, I wrote that someone should put together a “bingo card” of Brown’s stock phrases (updated in the wake of the expenses scandal) – and, this morning, CoffeeHouser Craig Harris emailed me to say he’d done just that. You can download his version by clicking here . Now our Dear Leader’s public appearances will never be the same again…

James Forsyth

Mandy on the move?

Sue Cameron’s notebook in the FT is a treasure trove of mini-scoops; few journalists are anywhere near as well connected in Whitehall—as opposed to Westminster—as she is. Today’s is no exception. Cameron reports that ‘Lord Mandelson, the business secretary, has let it be known he wants to jump ship to the Foreign Office’. Moving Mandelson to the Foreign Office is really the only obvious way out of the Royal Mail mess for Brown. But who will replace Mandelson at Business? I had heard that Alan Johnson was favoured, he is ideally suited to dealing with the Mail issue and it would put one of the government’s best media performers in

It’s Groundhog Day for Obama’s economic team

In Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania, there lives a fat rodent called Phil whose job it is in the middle of every winter to tell us how much longer we must suffer through the cold and dark until spring. Phil is a groundhog and his annual prediction is taken very seriously. There is even a celebrated film about him, starring Bill Murray. But this year Phil has been usurped by Barack Obama and Ben Bernanke. The President and his bearded Federal Reserve chief emerge daily from their offices like Phil from his hollow tree stump to tell us that ‘green shoots’ are poking through the hard and frozen earth despite obvious signs that

Happy birthday Big Ben

Though the moral fabric of Parliament is in tatters, its architecture remains an inspiration. Stephen Bayley celebrates Pugin’s crazy, magnificent clock tower Boing. That most familiar sound is now 150 years old. Because I am fortunate enough to live near Westminster, I often hear it during solitary moments at night in the bathroom. But, like the rest of the world, I know it even better from radio. At home or abroad, its sombre, magnificent melancholy is both reassuring and — somehow — a little bit disturbing, as time passing always is. In Mrs Dalloway Virginia Woolf wrote ‘There! Out it boomed. First a warning, musical; then the hour, irrevocable’. In

If we lose hearts and minds, we will lose the war

Sir Olaf Caroe — a legendary figure of the Raj, ethnographer of the Pashtuns and last administrator of the North-West Frontier of British India — wrote in 1958 that ‘unlike other wars, Afghan wars become serious only when they are over; in British times at least they were apt to produce an after-crop of tribal unrest [and] constant intrigue among the border tribes.’ Western leaders would have been wise to consider his words after the ‘stunning defeat’ of the Taleban, whose ramshackle theocratic tyranny crumbled in less than ten weeks’ fighting after 9/11. On 7 December 2001, as the last Taleban stronghold fell at Kandahar, only 110 CIA and a

James Forsyth

So much for the idea that Mohammed Siddique Khan was radicalised by Afghanistan or Iraq

From the Intelligence and Security Committee’s review of the Intelligence on the London Terrorist Attacks of 7 July 2005: This photograph was taken from CCTV footage from a surveillance operation of an “outward bound” expedition in January 2001 attended by 40 individuals. The police and MI5 showed pictures of the attendees to their sources and were able to identify nine of the people who had attended. The man in this image, along with 30 other individuals, was not identified at the time. 281. It was only several weeks after 7/7, when Mohammed Siddique KHAN was already known to have been one of the bombers, that a West Yorkshire Police Officer

Alex Massie

Burmese Groundhog Day

For any number of obvious reasons Burma doesn’t receive as much attention as Cuba. One of those reasons, mind you, is that there aren’t too many simpletons forever making excuses for the Burmese junta. Nor, mind you, is there a Cuban counterpart to Aung San Suu Kyi whose struggle for democratic reform in Burma is justly honoured and praised. But it’s nearly 20 years since the Generals took control, so isn’t it time to consider a change of approach? In other words, sanctions and isolation haven’t worked and all the while the plight of the Burmese people worsens. Kerry Howley, an old Burma han herself and now banned from the

Fraser Nelson

A waste of time | 19 May 2009

Was that it? Gordon Brown spent an hour talking about “radical action,” “radical surgery,” and the like. So what’s he doing? Setting up a committee. Or, more accurately, publishing a consultation paper on setting up a committee; one that would monitor MPs’ pay and expenses. And does anyone seriously believe it will come down harshly on MPs who, on £63k a year, are already amongst the best paid politicians in the world? Or does he envisage a conversation in the Dog & Duck: “I was really angry about those MPs, but then Gordon set up this committee”. Brown can’t stop repeating how he is the “first Prime Minister” to suggest

Brown’s press conference – live blog

Right, let’s try again. Hopefully this will be a more substantive live blog than the one covering Michael Martin’s 33-second special earlier.  Stay tuned from 1730 on. 1732: You can watch it live here.  There’s still no Brown yet, so you’ll have to put up with Downing Street muzak for now. 1735: Right, here’s Brown now.  He kicks off saying that the Speaker (remember him?) has chaired a meeting between the party leaders on expenses, and will reveal what came out of that shortly. 1737: Now Brown’s reeling off his plans for expenses.  He says that we need “immediate action” – which kinda contradicts his “wait for the Kelly Review”

Mapping expenses

Just to flag us this excellent “heat map” of MPs’ expenses over at MSN.  It imposes a constituency-by-constituency colour scheme on the whole UK, so you easily can see which MPs have been claiming the most.  You can even click on a constituency to get a more detailed breakdown of the corresponding expense claims. Now, I know it’s too simplistic to think that the highest expense claims (in this case, the deeper shades of red on the map) are automatically the “worst” or most dubious.  But I still believe that this kind of feature should be made easily available on the Parliament website.  In the end, transparency and the promise

Fraser Nelson

Glasgow North East deserves a by-election

But will there be a by-election? Sure, Michael Martin will step down on 21st June, but what about Glasgow North East? I know how much Gordon Brown enjoys Glasgow by-elections – and personally, I’d love another chance for the nation’s spotlight to fall in these Labour rotten boroughs.   One of the worst aspects of the Westminster system is that you don’t mean a thing if your seat’s not a swing – except for by-elections.  Martin could become an independent, and stay doing as bad a job for the people who elected him as he always has. But to quit, and let the world see this place – so typical

Michael Martin’s statement – live blog

Get ready for a little bit of history, as Michael Martin becomes the first Speaker to be pushed out of office in 300 years.  We’ll have live commentary of his “resignation” statement from 1430 onwards.  Stay tuned.  1418: Sky News are reporting that Martin will announce he’s stepping down in June. 1434: Martin has begun speaking to a packed House. 1435: He says he’s going to relinquish the office of Speaker on Sunday, 21st June, in order to “maintain unity” in the Commons.  The next Speaker will be elected the day after. 1435: And, erm, that’s it. 1437: Incredibly short statement from Martin – businesslike and unemotional.  I imagine he’d

Alex Massie

Ken Loach’s Bullying Ghastliness

This is normally Melanie’s territory and it is disgraceful. The chain of events seems to be this: 1. The Edinburgh International Film Festival invites Israeli film-maker Tali Shalom-Ezer to show his her* short film Surrogate in Edinburgh. 2. The Israeli Embassy in London contributes £300 to help pay for Shalom-Ezer to come to the Scottlnd. 3. The so-called Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign objects to this and threatens to picket the festival. 4. EIFF says, “do your worst”. 5. SPSC do just that, recruiting Ken Loach who calls for a boycott of the festival. 6. EIFF caves and returns the donation to the Israelis. The sum involved is, of course, trivial.

Alex Massie

Back to the Twentieth Century

Apologies for light posting: a power cut this morning cut one off from the outside world, returning us to the dark days of the twentieth century. It was most disconcerting. Doubly so in fact, for it was disconcerting how disconcerted one was at being denied access to the interwebs for just a few hours. Involuntarily denied of course. It’s a different matter when one chooses to be free from modern communications for a few days: that’s precious solitude that is all the sweeter for being so fleeting and unusual. Still, at least it solves the question of what luxury one would demand in the event of being marooned upon a

Fraser Nelson

Who took away Martin’s chair?

The big question is what changed Michael Martin’s mind. I suspect that both Brown and Cameron withdrew support. But I’d argue that Cameron should have done so last weekend in public as Nick Clegg did. And, come to think of it, I agree with the LibDem proposal that all capital gains on property bought with mortgages funded by the taxpayer should be returned to the taxpayer. I can’t help thinking that Cameron is being out-flanked on the need for radical reform by Cable and Clegg. Cameron could of course argue that this all is a serious constitutional issue and should not descend into a competition to see who can be