Society

Up to old tricks

Is Anybody There? 12A, Nationwide Is Anybody There? stars Michael Caine as a grumpy old fella who, begrudgingly, goes to live in an old people’s home where his fellow residents are played by Rosemary Harris, Elizabeth Spriggs, Peter Vaughan, Thelma Barlow, Sylvia Syms and Leslie Phillips but not Peter O’Toole, who appears to be the one that got away. (Apparently, he is quite nippy once he gets going and a devil to catch.) I was incredibly up for this film, imagining it as some kind of Cocoon, only hopefully not as rubbish. Plus it’s always nice to see the older actors doing their bit and taking the pressure off, say,

Are electric cars really the next big step for mankind?

Putting Lord Mandelson into an electric Mini may not seem to bear much comparison with putting a man on the moon, but there are interesting parallels. In 1961, the US government embarked on the Apollo space programme, with the ambition of landing astronauts on the moon by the end of the decade. By 1969, it had achieved exactly what it set out to do. But it was a risky project, with no guarantee of success. To land on the moon, scientists had to solve three problems: how to rendezvous and dock with another spacecraft, how to work outside a spacecraft, and how to survive prolonged periods of time in space.

‘Yes there is a problem. Yes we are correcting it’

In an exclusive interview, Sir Michael Lyons, the BBC chairman, talks to Matthew d’Ancona about the licence fee, the Ross-Brand affair — and hints at flexibility over funding If there is a stereotype of the BBC chairman, Sir Michael Lyons does not match it. Marmaduke Hussey, for instance, was the archetypal establishment patrician, while Gavyn Davies was one of the original New Labour cronies (felled by the Hutton Inquiry). Sir Michael, in contrast, has a beaming, technocratic countenance, the look of a brand manager at Sunshine Desserts who has good news for C.J. about tapioca sales. Which is probably a good thing, given the scale and the nature of the

Fraser Nelson

A tale of two Gordons: why Gekko is right and Brown is wrong

The Eighties mantra ‘greed is good’ may be unfashionable, says Fraser Nelson, but it is still true. We have forgotten that wealth generates revenue, while high taxes crush prosperity and pauperise nations. Will the Conservatives have the guts to declare this economic truth? Before Gordon Brown was writing books about political courage, the subject that fascinated him most was greed. He detected plenty of it when the Thatcher revolution was in full bloom. In 1987 he wrote a polemical book entitled Where There’s Greed, denouncing both the Conservatives and the ‘sinister insights of Adam Smith’. The surge in wealth on both sides of the Atlantic had that year been brilliantly

James Forsyth

What Specter’s defection means

The defection of Arlen Specter is a nice momentum booster for Obama on the eve of his 100th day in office. To be sure, by switching parties Specter has saved himself a debilitating primary fight and pretty much guaranteed himself re-election in a state that is becoming increasingly Democratic. But even if the move is hardly a profile in courage, it should still worry the Republican Party. It means that once Al Franken is seated the Democrats will have 60 votes in the Senate; if the Democrats are united they will be able to vote down a filibuster. Specter’s departure also acts as an illustration of how the Republican Party

Dinner time

This story, via Sky, is too bizarre not to mention: “A Serbian union official has chopped off his finger and eaten it in a protest over wages to show how desperate he and other workers are. ‘We, the workers have nothing to eat, we had to seek some sort of alternative food and I gave them an example,’ Zoran Bulatovic said. ‘It hurt like hell,’ he added. Mr Bulatovic, a union leader at the Raska Holding textile factory in Novi Pazar, southwest Serbia, used a hacksaw to cut off most of his left-hand little finger. Mr Bulatovic decided to act after his deputy, a single mother of three, said she

Alex Massie

Great GOP Victory! Arlen Specter Now Officially a Democrat!

Well, you gotta hand it to them. The Republican party’s base finally got rid of Republican-In-Name-Only Arlen Specter. The Pennsylvania Senator has had enough and isn’t going to take it anymore. He’s now a Democrat. And so, a heretic was cast into the wilderness and the conservative movement offered great hosannas of joy. Better to be small but pure than large and corrupted by moderation and squishy centrism. That this defection may ensure the Democrats have a filibuster-proof 60 votes in the Senate matters less than enforcing ideological conformity. That’s how you win these days, right? Granted, Al Franken still has to be confirmed as the winner in Minnesota and

James Forsyth

Engaging our academics

Mary Dejevsky writes today on one of my favourite topics, why aren’t British academics more engaged in policy debates. Where is the British Greg Mankiw or Paul Krugman? It is crazy that we have four of the 10 best universities in the world, but that our academics play such a limited role in public life and policy debates. There’s plenty of blame to go round for this. Government departments are too unwilling to ask for outside advice and our political parties do a bad job of tapping academia for ideas. But, I think, the biggest problem is our academics. Far too many of them view policy as beneath them and any contact

A glimpse inside the Tory war room

The Tories have just launched the first in their new series of “War room Briefings”; videos which go behind-the-scenes of their campaign operation.  It’s not earth-shattering stuff – but a nice use of the internet nonetheless, and good viewing for us political anoraks: P.S. While we’re talking online videos, the Economist’s Bagehot blog has a post on how YouTube is “helping to finish off” Brown.

Alex Massie

The Great ID Card Con

Identity Cards would be a Bad Idea even if there were any reason to suppose they would work. So I’m intrigued by the suggestion Pete mentions that this multi-billion pound absurdity might be cancelled. Because of the state of the public finances of course. I doubt it will be abandoned since a) government value control even more than money and b) if it were, the government would presumably have to agree that ID cards won’t save lives. On the other hand – and from the Home Office’s perspective, looking upon the bright side of matters –  they would then be able to blame ID card opponents for the next terrorist

Alex Massie

Republicans at 21% and Full Speed Ahead!

Indefatigable commenter ConservativeCabbie argues: No doubt someone will report on the latest WaPo poll which shows Republican ID at 21% and use it as evidences of the GOP’s terminal decline. The only thing I would say to this… is that in the most recent important poll, the election, the GOP still won 47% of the vote. And that was with decidedly unpropitious circumstances. I agree that the GOP are on the ropes. But isn’t that a fact when it comes to parties falling out of power – that they move towards  their more extreme base before moving back to the middle. That’s what happened to post-Carter Democrats, post-Callaghan Labour and

The ID card scrap

There’s much ado about ID cards ’round Westminster today.  Reports in this morning’s papers suggest that the Government is thinking about scrapping the £5 billion project, to help combat the debt crisis.  The Independent even has a “senior Cabinet minister” telling them that, “My sense is that ID cards will not go ahead.  We have to find savings somewhere, and it would be better to shelve schemes like this that aren’t popular.”  Yet the PM’s spokesman has just briefed the lobby that the government “remains committed” to the scheme. To my mind, this highlights the political difficulty that the government will face in dealing with the debt crisis.  If they

Trouble in the Labour Party over expenses

The more that emerges about Brown’s YouTube calamity on expenses, the more stupid it seems.  The immediate theory was that Brown released it to wrongfoot David Cameron and Nick Clegg.  I’d go along with that.  But it turns out that his own party didn’t know anything about it either.  This in today’s Guardian. Downing Street’s handling of the matter was also strongly criticised by Labour MPs at a lengthy meeting of the parliamentary Labour party last night. During what was described as a ‘fractious’ meeting, MPs criticised Brown for making his announcement on a YouTube broadcast last Tuesday without any reference to them. Some MPs had raised the matter at

A lack of guidance

If you’re wading through all the swine flu coverage this morning, I’d recommend you take time to read the article by Dr John Crippen – the pseudonymous author of NHS Blog Doctor – in the Guardian.  It hints at a disorganised response to the illness in the UK: “Today is one of those days when family doctors want to retire to a darkened room and put an ice pack on their head. Over breakfast, I saw the newspaper headline: ‘Swine flu deaths spark worldwide health alert’. I have not been ‘alerted’. None of my partners has been ‘alerted’ either. There is a general assumption that GPs will already have received

Alex Massie

If Dick Cheney had won the Republican nomination last year…

Ross Douthat’s debut column for the New York Times begins with a good joke, designed (one might think) to have the Upper West Side howling that all the talk of young Mr Douthat being a conservative we can do business with must be so much baloney: Watching Dick Cheney defend the Bush administration’s interrogation policies, it’s been hard to escape the impression that both the Republican Party and the country would be better off today if Cheney, rather than John McCain, had been a candidate for president in 2008. But Ross makes a persuasive case that the country could have benefitted from a discussion of national security and interrogation policies

Alex Massie

The Swine Flu Shot

After the jump, a series of American PSAs warning about Swine Flu, dating from 1976. The second of them features a soundtrack that sounds as though it more properly should accompany a detective show on American TV. Or, for that matter, a movie such as The Three Days of the Condor. Appropriate in times such as these, the government never ceases to remind us, when You Can Never Be Too Careful. Trust Nobody, remember. These days, mind you, any such government-sponsored warning would be much, much more terrifying and, one presumes, be designed to convince us all that the apocalypse was upon us and yet also – conveniently –  avertable.

Alex Massie

The Changing Face of Domestic Murder

Consider this chart: As you can see, since 1976  there’s been a marked decline in the number of men murdered by their wives in the United States and a smaller, but still significant, decrease in the number of women killed by their husbands. The graph comes from Sociological Images where Jay Livingston asks for suggestions that might explain this trend. He suggests that perhaps men are behaving better (not a popular theory, I’m going to guess) and that women have more options, citing the work of women’s shelters and the like in making it easier for women to escape abusive situations without murdering their spouse. Matt Yglesias says, however, that