Society

James Forsyth

A poll to undermine Brown’s authority

Today’s Guardian poll suggesting Labour would do better with someone other than Gordon at the helm is another blow to Brown. Realistically I can’t see Brown being replaced as Labour leader before the next election, there’s no stomach for the bloody struggle that it would take to prise Brown out of Downing Street and it is not obvious that anyone would actually improve Labour’s fortunes once installed in the job. But the idea that Brown is dragging down Labour’s numbers being splashed across the front page of The Guardian reduces Brown’s authority. It is harder for him to tell the Cabinet and the party that they have to listen to

A landscape of risk and potential

The Daily Mail has today picked up a scare story initially given (rather more nuanced) prominence by the Guardian’s ever-more influential Jackie Ashley. Speaking in a debate about social networking sites, Baroness Greenfield, Oxford neuroscientist and director of the Royal Institution, argued that the new digital technologies may actually be changing the brains of a generation as well as the means of communication that they have at their disposal. Web 2.0., in other words, may have neuroscientific consequences of immense importance. “My fear,” said Professor Greenfield, “is that these technologies are infantilising the brain into the state of small children who are attracted by buzzing noises and bright lights, who

Dragging a Rock

There’s plenty in today’s papers about Alistair Darling’s U-turn on Northern Rock.  The Lombard column in the FT sums it up: the Rock has become a “dangerous laboratory for banking policy”, screeching from reining in its business one minute to expanding back into the mortgage market the next.  To my mind, it’s a clear demonstration of what can happen when something becomes political.  The government knows it’s open to criticism over its handling of NR, so it’s flapping around to find something – anything – that will work. Problem is, what grabs the short-term headlines may result in medium-term embarassment.  Take the figure the Government have slapped on Northern Rock’s new

James Forsyth

The next Republican president

Tomorrow night, Bobby Jindal, the governor of Louisiana, will give the Republican response to Barack Obama’s televised speech to a joint session of Congress. Jindal is the rising star of the Republican party. Only 37, Jindal is the governor of Louisiana having already been a Congressman and an assistant secretary at Health and Human Services in the Bush administration. He’s a fiscal and social conservative and is rapidly developing a deserved reputation for competent governance; just compare the state of Louisiana’s response to hurricanes Gustav and Katrina. The Bush presidency lost the Republicans their historic reputation for competence, Jindal offers them a chance to win it back and it is

Some Monday night viewing

This is as nectar for political anoraks: a new collection of BBC archive videos charting Margaret Thatcher’s rise to becoming Prime Minister.  Some nostalgic viewing in there for CoffeeHousers, I dare say. Hat-tip: Conservative Home

Grayling debuts his own soundbite

Say what you will about soundbites, but there’s little doubting the power they can have.  Take, for instance, Tony Blair’s famous declaration that Labour would be “Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime”.  Not only was it memorable and snappy, but it encapsulated, and still encapsulates, the kind of Broken Windows thinking that’s since become near-consensus.  Problem is, it’s so good a soundbite, that – despite Labour’s failure to live up the pledge – subsequent politicians and oppositions have struggled to escape its shadow.  How else to describe an approach on crime? Chris Grayling made a valiant effort to shift the goalposts in his first major speech as shadow home

James Forsyth

How Brown’s backtracking on school reform 

Ever since Gordon Brown became Prime Minister and Ed Balls Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, there has been a steady attempt to undermine the academies programme. Brown and Balls have set about rolling back the freedoms that the academies had been given and quietly bringing them back under the dead hand of the local education authorities. This letter (reprinted in full below) to Jim Knight, the Schools Minister, from the Independent Academies Association details just what the Brown government is trying to do and how pernicious it is. Regardless of whether Brown and Balls are doing this out of a wrong-headed ideological commitment or to appease interest

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 23 February – 1 March

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers’ Wall. For those who haven’t come across the Wall before, it’s a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local

Lib-Con love after the next election?

An intriguing insight from Tim Montgomerie, about some potential Lib-Con love after the next election:  “I understand that a group of shadow ministers believe that one of Tony Blair’s bigger strategic mistakes was to row back on co-operation with the Liberal Democrats when he won such a large Commons majority in 1997.  These shadow ministers believe that – contrary to Labour’s ‘under-delivery’ to the LibDems – the Conservatives should deliver more in practical co-operation in government than they promise in opposition. The discussion is not of ministerial positions – although there might be some significant appointments to policy reviews – but of working groups on issues of shared interest.  Action

James Forsyth

The weakening of the New Labour coalition

As Martin says, the divide in the government right now is whether the right legislative response to the recession is to–in political shorthand– ‘ease the burdens on business’ or ‘protect workers more’. Today’s splash in The Times about Peter Mandelson’s plan to postpone the plans for more generous maternity leave and tougher equalities legislation which Harriet Harman has been pushing for, and were announced in the Queen’s Speech in December, shows that this debate is live not theoretical. Stoking the tension is that everyone knows that, in the Labour leadership contest that would follow a defeat at the next election, those who are ‘on the side of workers’ will benefit. Harman’s

The return of rage

One of the few things missing from our country’s, and Gordon Brown’s, cocktail of woes has been major civic unrest.  Sure, we’ve seen strikes – most notably at the Lindsey oil refinery – but nothing as vitriolic, or as large, as the riots in Greece or Saturday’s protest in Dublin.  That could be about to change.  According to today’s important Guardian cover story, police are gearing up for a “summer of rage”, the timing of which could dent Brown’s Last Great Hope to rescue his premiership:   [Superintendent David] Hartshorn[, chief of the Met’s public order branch] identified April’s G20 meeting of the group of leading and developing nations in

James Forsyth

The real number two at the White House

The Obama campaign was a no-drama operation. Partly this was a matter of the candidate’s temperament but it was also to create a contrast first with the drama-filled Clinton campaign that suffered from a surfeit of egos and then with the McCain campaign whose principal seemed, at times, to be almost addicted to the dramatic gesture. But the decision to bring in some of the most colourful figures in the Democratic Party into the administration has, though, rather changed things.  Take the hyper-competitive Rahm Emanuel, the former Clinton White House staffer—Josh Lyman in the West Wing is based on him—turned Congressman, who Obama drafted in to be his chief of staff.

James Forsyth

I worry about the anti-politics mood our politicians are fostering  

Read pretty much any Sunday newspaper today and you’ll come across stories of politicians making expenses claim that, to put it mildly, stretch the spirit of the regulations. The Jacqui Smith story has prompted the press to go digging and they have come up with a lot of stuff. The MPs involved are not all from one party and so all this strengthens the public’s sense that they are all at it, that the political class is fundamentally corrupt. The tax-paying public, who in many cases are desperately worried about their own finances because of the recession, look at the gravy train which exists at local, national and European levels

Brown still doing “everything it takes”

Brace yourselves.  It looks as though the next couple of weeks are going to be among Brown’s busiest and – so far as the taxpayer’s concerned – costliest yet.  As the Sunday Times sets out, the flurry of initiatives and announcements may include: a call to ban 100 percent mortgages; a cash injection of £10 billion for Northern Rock; the start of a £100 billion programme of “quantitative easing”; and the establishment of a “bad bank”.  The final tab could hit an eye-watering £500 billion. It’s the proposal to ban 100 percent mortgages which catches the eye and, to be fair to Brown, it makes a great deal of sense. 

Here’s the Latest From Your Neo-Con Socialist

I was always shocked by the level of vitriol among New Statesman and Guardian readers when a writer stepped away from the comfort zone of received wisdom and cuddly “I’m a nice person too” leftie-ness. Suggest that perhaps Hamas is anything other than a resistance movement or that people who vote Conservative might be people too and the sky falls in. Where the stock term of self-righteous abuse used to be “fascist” – remember Rick from the Young Ones? – it is now “neo-con”, which consigns the target  to the same ideological hell as George W. Bush. Since I’ve started this new blog I have not been called a neo-con. Instead, the insult

Alex Massie

A Very British Diarist

Chris Mullin is a good egg and, what’s more has a pawky sense of humour. So I imagine his diaries, serialised in the Mail on Sunday this week, will be entertaining stuff. What strikes one above all – apart from the digs at Gordon Brown’s expense – is the sheer and ghastly tedium of being a government minister. It’s almost enough to make one think they deserve their generous expense accounts and lavish pension. Almost, I say. But then the government reminds you of the extent of its ghastliness. Mullin describes one such event that in some sense seems to ilustrate the gruesome nature of modern politics in general and

Slow Life | 21 February 2009

Child’s play During the night or behind a cloud the sunshine had changed colour, and now as it shone all over me it launched cascades of contemplation, pleasant images flashing like fireworks as it smashed into my closed eyelids. Bang, bang, bang and involuntarily I was carried off, launched headlong down a fast-flowing river of rediscovered hopes. Whole new vistas came into view with those gold rays. Don’t even know what I’d been thinking about before, but with the warmth came a bigger picture, new horizons, thoughts of escape. We’ll do a week in Bournemouth. We’ll go to Scotland, Japan maybe, the whole world: all this unfolding quicker than a

Low Life | 21 February 2009

The other night, Jim, a pub landlord, was complaining angrily to me about the government. I listened but said nothing. Then he produced a newspaper clipping. It was an article about the British army’s latest sniper rifle. It had a range of, I forget what — two miles? In the wrong hands, said Jim, it would be possible for someone to lean out of an upstairs window in Lambeth and pot a New Labour politician fumbling for his car keys in the members’ car park of the House of Commons. In fact, I was looking at the wrong hands right now, he said, spreading them on the bar. Would I